]]>
My "pathetically stupid photoshop" political cartoons (as are most political cartoons) are supposed to incite a strong reaction. I get tons of e-mails from Japan for having included their (over whales), but no one has suggested I remove them... So far I've only been sued by a puppy mill for libel (not a cartoon but because I said there kennel was a puppy mill on my website), and they have since dropped their action against me (I put the entire Notice of Action online, and got their lawyers upset at the bad publicity)...
Statistics: Posted by Spin — Fri Mar 24, 2006 11:31 am
]]>
]]>
but honestly if you banned meat hunter for that....im just curious....did you warn him about it? i mean i was accused of trying to incite when i posted fish pictures.....(one was filleted, or in the process of being filleted)..im not certain if my goal was to incite (i really don't recall, i do recall i was proud of the catch though). it could have been...but it may have also been innocent as i do often post pictures in similar fashion on bulletin boards for general info, and not to incite. my point being, i was given the opportunity to remove mine back then and did so at the request of the moderation/admin at that time.
Statistics: Posted by wijim — Fri Mar 24, 2006 12:08 am
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
Thu Mar 23, 2006 3:41 pm
And the offensive pictures were removed in an edit less than 45 minutes later.
Last edited by Spin on Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:25 pm; edited 1 time in total
Even if they were offensive there was a pro-active effort to remove the potential by the poster, which would be a factor to consider as a difference.
Statistics: Posted by Wayne Stollings — Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:37 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>