On the thread Animal Persons - Direct Action - Law&Order,
this is what Grizzly Bear wrote:
Grizzly Bear wrote:
Who the hell anointed you the thought and speech police? The stench of your arrogance is unbearable, Ante.
My response to this was more or less: likewise, your arrogance stinks. I think that any decent and fair human who has seen my post would agree with this.
So, my question is: why is it that when an anti animal user attacks animal liberationist, it's OK - his post is left alone - while my post, which was only a defense against such a malicious attack is deleted?
My I ad, that this is not an isolated case. If I had the time I could point out numerous similar examples.
In the meantime I hear the opposite claims. But, I have not seen any examples or clear rational argument regarding this from the hunters' camp yet.
Could this sort of bias be the reason why this forum is dominated by "anti-animal hunters' mafia?" Best, Ante.