Just as an aside on the subject of definitions and misrepresentations, there is no implied fault with calling something a misrepresentation as opposed to calling something a lie.
I prefer to use misrepresentation in the case of an incorrect statement for just this reason, regardless of the popular implication. The same for the usage of ignorant. It is not an attack but a statement of some lack of knowledge.
Mis·rep·re·sen·ta·tion
n.
Untrue representation; false or incorrect statement or account; -- usually unfavorable to the thing represented; as, a misrepresentation of a person's motives. Sydney Smith.
Note: In popular use, this word often conveys the idea of intentional untruth.
lie2 (lî)
n.
A false statement deliberately presented as being true; a falsehood.
In the case of the use of the term manslaughter, it was not correct as it implies a level of fault that was not present. None knew at the time whether it was an intentional usage by anyone or a repeated usage with the assumption of fact. Both cases are fairly common in discussions such as this, so there will be a need to point out what appears to be a misrepresentation for further clarification so that the correct situation may be determined. I assume not being familiar with the legal terms nor even the possible differences in the terms between the US and UK (not even considering OZ yet) could account for such a misunderstanding. Werefox seems to have given a plausible explanation to the misunderstanding and I for one look forward to continuing the discussion on the issue on a rational manner.
|
