EnviroLink Forum
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/

DELETED
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1804
Page 3 of 5

Author:  Amy7779311 [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 1:36 pm ]
Post subject: 

xveganx wrote:
I have not posted porn and so YOU are casting aspersions on me with your attack. The missy and your accusations the I post porn only compound the FACT that you are the aggressor.

The topic of this post was not pointed at YOU even, YOU put your nose in to stir up and cause trouble. This was your only motive for posting here.

And I am awaiting retractions from you both.


Where did I attack you or say that you posted porn?

Do you not know what "SO" other means? It means "significant other".

My motive for posting here was to comment on how I felt the board was going until you arrived again. It was relevant to the accusations that you placed on wjim.

Author:  Amy7779311 [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 1:44 pm ]
Post subject: 

emuking5 wrote:
Amy you ARE being very aggresive lately, I think you should apologize to xveganx, and xveganx should apologize to you. Then we can solve this without having to have josh pop another blood vessle of stress, we can all go get a peace pipe and smoke it until we can open a book of "wheres waldo" and find him in a second :D :D


Please note who it is that I am being aggressive with.

I think that some of us new people who had some time fitting into the arguments are fitting in quite well as of late...and you'll even note that we've not has this heated type debate going since...well..since last week. I note this because it does seem that xveganx is headed in the same type of direction. I'm not insinuating that xveganx will post porn, but it does seem as if things are going from nice discussions...right back to the gazillion threads in the feedback forum...and trying to force Josh to change his rules. I had a beef before with Josh and how he applies his rules...still do. I'm just not screaming all over his board about it.

Anyway... yes I will admit to being aggressive with xveganx, but I did not attack them. I won't apologize because I have done nothing wrong with this.

Author:  DELETED [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:08 pm ]
Post subject: 

DELETED

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:13 pm ]
Post subject: 

OK, why can't we all just get along?

Here is what we are going to do at this point in time.

There will be no further mention of Gay Porn

I will not abide anyone holding one person responsible for the actions of another unless they have factual evidence of complicity.

The post was, in my opinion, designed to crank up the AR side. This is similar to the AR side posting similar pictures to inflame themselves, IMO. The ARAs can protest fishing as if is were the reason for the post, as far as I am concerned. I do not believe it was too far out, but it will be Josh's final call on the matter.

I am pleased the way things had gone for the past week, and that so many cooler thoughts were presented. I am not that pleased that this flare up started in the first place and it WAS on the very edge even with the additional comments on the effects of predator fish.

Author:  Amy7779311 [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:14 pm ]
Post subject: 

xveganx wrote:

I am on this forum as an individual. I have done nothing wrong but you attack me because of what another person does! If you SO killed a man would you expect to be charged along with him? No , I did not think so. The only reason it was posted was to insult.


I did not attack you.

*edited to remove a reference that is no longer allowed*

Author:  DELETED [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:17 pm ]
Post subject: 

DELETED

Author:  Amy7779311 [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:18 pm ]
Post subject: 

Wayne, I posted the post above before seeing what you just posted.

I'll go edit.

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:18 pm ]
Post subject: 

I have changed my mind, the pictures went out, but the thread stayed given there were some points made later on.

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:19 pm ]
Post subject: 

Amy7779311 wrote:
Wayne, I posted the post above before seeing what you just posted.

I'll go edit.


Thank you.

Author:  Amy7779311 [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:20 pm ]
Post subject: 

xveganx wrote:
It is quiet evident why you came to this topic and it is no secret you are friends with wijim and was acting as a double act like in many other cases a group of friends get together on this forum. I have said my piece.


I already explained why I came to the topic.

Now I am also done with this discussion, and you.

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:21 pm ]
Post subject: 

xveganx wrote:
Amy7779311 wrote:
xveganx wrote:

I am on this forum as an individual. I have done nothing wrong but you attack me because of what another person does! If you SO killed a man would you expect to be charged along with him? No , I did not think so. The only reason it was posted was to insult.


I did not attack you.

I noted that your significant other had posted porn on this board. I never suggested that you were going to do the same.


It is quiet evident why you came to this topic and it is no secret you are friends with wijim and was acting as a double act like in many other cases a group of friends get together on this forum. I have said my piece.


There are friends and acquaintances on both sides. Some share views and some do not. I think this is evident and understood by all. I do not think there is a need to belabor the point any further do you?

Author:  DELETED [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:21 pm ]
Post subject: 

DELETED

Author:  Amy7779311 [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:21 pm ]
Post subject: 

Wayne Stollings wrote:
I have changed my mind, the pictures went out, but the thread stayed given there were some points made later on.


Thanks for leaving the thread, Wayne. I was enjoying talking about fish and such.

Author:  RF [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:56 pm ]
Post subject: 

The fish pictures were obviously accompanied by the wrong text.

It should have read something like: "Look at these poor fish...look how they suffered! Whoever did this should be dunked into the hole he cut in the ice, retrieved on a string, and then have his frozen balls cut off! There is NO excuse for torturing defenseless animals in this manner!"

Author:  wijim [ Mon Jan 23, 2006 3:16 pm ]
Post subject: 

RF wrote:
The fish pictures were obviously accompanied by the wrong text.

It should have read something like: "Look at these poor fish...look how they suffered! Whoever did this should be dunked into the hole he cut in the ice, retrieved on a string, and then have his frozen balls cut off! There is NO excuse for torturing defenseless animals in this manner!"


apparently so. its either that or possibly i had made the mistake of not typing my meanings slowly enough for the overly sensitive little flowers to understand.

Page 3 of 5 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/