EnviroLink Forum
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/

Discussion of Forum Rules
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5643
Page 8 of 8

Author:  animallover [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Discussion of Forum Rules

jhawk wrote:
animallover wrote:
Because all games aside, as I am not really into games to begin with, she is who has been referred to throughout, indirectly, as has been your intent in protecting her position the past few days. Which is fine and I understand that. Second she is the only one that has "chosen" to to quit posting herself and instead has taken a sideline position.


Ok AL, just to put the record straight, I'll defend ANYONE who I think is being singled out for unfairness. That is my way.
From the sidelines, you get a good idea of what is going on in a ' game ' , more than the players.
If people don't like me defending (not protecting) anyone then tough !

So let's move on .


Assuptions are a funny thing. You are assuming that she was singled out and you would be wrong in that assumption. The difference being everyone else read their PM and complied without drama. You have no idea what was said and whom it was said to. The problem with a sideline position is you only get one view. You can defend anyone you wish but it would be wise only to do so if you are sure of the facts involved first and not based on assumptions. :wink:
And moving on is a wise suggestion.

Author:  jhawk [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Discussion of Forum Rules

animallover wrote:
jhawk wrote:
animallover wrote:
Because all games aside, as I am not really into games to begin with, she is who has been referred to throughout, indirectly, as has been your intent in protecting her position the past few days. Which is fine and I understand that. Second she is the only one that has "chosen" to to quit posting herself and instead has taken a sideline position.


Ok AL, just to put the record straight, I'll defend ANYONE who I think is being singled out for unfairness. That is my way.
From the sidelines, you get a good idea of what is going on in a ' game ' , more than the players.
If people don't like me defending (not protecting) anyone then tough !

So let's move on .


Assuptions are a funny thing. You are assuming that she was singled out and you would be wrong in that assumption. The difference being everyone else read their PM and complied without drama. You have no idea what was said and whom it was said to. The problem with a sideline position is you only get one view. You can defend anyone you wish but it would be wise only to do so if you are sure of the facts involved first and not based on assumptions. :wink:
And moving on is a wise suggestion.


********************
And moving on is a wise suggestion.[/color][/quote]

So do it for goodness sake !

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 7:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Discussion of Forum Rules

animallover wrote:
jhawk wrote:
animallover wrote:
Because all games aside, as I am not really into games to begin with, she is who has been referred to throughout, indirectly, as has been your intent in protecting her position the past few days. Which is fine and I understand that. Second she is the only one that has "chosen" to to quit posting herself and instead has taken a sideline position.


Ok AL, just to put the record straight, I'll defend ANYONE who I think is being singled out for unfairness. That is my way.
From the sidelines, you get a good idea of what is going on in a ' game ' , more than the players.
If people don't like me defending (not protecting) anyone then tough !

So let's move on .


Assuptions are a funny thing. You are assuming that she was singled out and you would be wrong in that assumption. The difference being everyone else read their PM and complied without drama. You have no idea what was said and whom it was said to. The problem with a sideline position is you only get one view. You can defend anyone you wish but it would be wise only to do so if you are sure of the facts involved first and not based on assumptions. :wink:
And moving on is a wise suggestion.



jhawk wrote:

********************
And moving on is a wise suggestion.[/color]


So do it for goodness sake ![/quote]

Lets do just that, I think everyone has had a chance to understand the situation So there should be no need to bring it up again, right? I think any further mentions of the prior violations of the current rules would be subject to an official warning after this point.

Author:  jhawk [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Discussion of Forum Rules

Ok AL, just to put the record straight, I'll defend ANYONE who I think is being singled out for unfairness. That is my way.
From the sidelines, you get a good idea of what is going on in a ' game ' , more than the players.
If people don't like me defending (not protecting) anyone then tough !

So let's move on .[/quote]

Assuptions are a funny thing. You are assuming that she was singled out and you would be wrong in that assumption. The difference being everyone else read their PM and complied without drama. You have no idea what was said and whom it was said to. The problem with a sideline position is you only get one view. You can defend anyone you wish but it would be wise only to do so if you are sure of the facts involved first and not based on assumptions. :wink:
And moving on is a wise suggestion.
[/quote]


jhawk wrote:

********************
And moving on is a wise suggestion.[/color]


So do it for goodness sake ![/quote]

Lets do just that, I think everyone has had a chance to understand the situation So there should be no need to bring it up again, right? I think any further mentions of the prior violations of the current rules would be subject to an official warning after this point.[/quote]

**************************
Thanks Wayne. Hopefully this means PMs too.

Page 8 of 8 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/