EnviroLink Forum
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/

Siber's complaint
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7677
Page 1 of 2

Author:  SiberD [ Tue May 20, 2008 9:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Siber's complaint

Quote:
were is the Oswalds when ya need them


Damn, I get banned for some snide remarks but this kind of shit is allowed?

Amazing.

Author:  Donnie Mac Leod [ Tue May 20, 2008 9:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Perhaps you will listen to a non-vegetarian?

SiberD wrote:
Quote:
were is the Oswalds when ya need them


Damn, I get banned for some snide remarks but this kind of shit is allowed?

Amazing.



But your snideness is much smarter then some folks snideness, which kinda shows you should know better. :wink: But I would have to say you are right to feel slighted in light of the noted remark,SD.

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Tue May 20, 2008 10:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Perhaps you will listen to a non-vegetarian?

Donnie Mac Leod wrote:
SiberD wrote:
Quote:
were is the Oswalds when ya need them


Damn, I get banned for some snide remarks but this kind of shit is allowed?

Amazing.



But your snideness is much smarter then some folks snideness, which kinda shows you should know better. :wink: But I would have to say you are right to feel slighted in light of the noted remark,SD.


Considering it takes three warnings to get banned it would seem one might have to want that to happen .... :wink:

Author:  SiberD [ Wed May 21, 2008 6:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Perhaps you will listen to a non-vegetarian?

Quote:

Considering it takes three warnings to get banned it would seem one might have to want that to happen .... :wink:


Or, it could mean I forgot how to goosestep.

Author:  pops [ Wed May 21, 2008 6:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Perhaps you will listen to a non-vegetarian?

SiberD wrote:
Quote:
were is the Oswalds when ya need them


Damn, I get banned for some snide remarks but this kind of shit is allowed?

Amazing.

You got banned? Oh happy day! But ... but... but how are you posting if you're banned?
Oh and I can't find where any body here said anything about any Oswalds.

Author:  SiberD [ Wed May 21, 2008 6:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Perhaps you will listen to a non-vegetarian?

pops wrote:



Amazing.
You got banned? Oh happy day! But ... but... but how are you posting if you're banned?


You didn't notice? That brings a tear to me eye knowing you didn't miss me. T'was a temporary vacation.


Quote:
Oh and I can't find where any body here said anything about any Oswalds.


Didn't look very hard, did you?

Quote:
towerace123 Post subject: Re: Perhaps you will listen to a non-vegetarian?Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 3:57 pm

funny. well i know this wont win me any friends but people thats fat needs
worked hard and feed only enough food to keep them working hard
i believe the waste thing go to any all you can eat place and watch the fat people fill a plate eat half of it and go back for more
goes back to the lazy people being the problem.on the other side of the coin you have the people who do nothing for jobs and have to exersize
these people are a drain on working people as well.
i will bet that most of the waste comes from people with little moral fabric.
most country folks are tought like me you get it out you eat it even at an all you can eat pace.
i dont let my kids waste food if the dog dont get it the chickens do.
waste not want not
there is a fault in our tax system here in the states that dont let food companys
give there food away.its tossed in the land fills and even when you can talk the stores into letting you have there old food
you have to cook it before you feed it to your animals this is an area we should all team up and fight to change.
thats alot of food.ive seen trailer loads 40 feet long dumped in the landfill because the cerial boxes were to full or not full enough
stupid aint it
obama wants the us to fund feeding the world
he is a lying joke anyone that believes him is dummer then a rock
he is a raciest liberal that talks down common folks .
Admin note: edited to remove possibly illegal comment

Author:  SiberD [ Wed May 21, 2008 6:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Perhaps you will listen to a non-vegetarian?

Oops :oops:

Author:  towerace123 [ Wed May 21, 2008 12:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Siber's complaint

i have been set strait on that one .
the point was obama is undoing everything that king did to end racism
a white man cal make a nappy headed commint about blacks and loses his job.
obama make snide remarks about a whole state and is seen telling the truth and its ok.
yet the black girls do have nappy type of hair and some how thats wrong.
is he not an open racist
is it not fesable to think that some redneck may see this discrimination against whites and decide
something needs done. its apparent that todays people see it as ok for the black man to discriminate
with his naacp and all the affirmative action movments yet a white man must still get higher grades
and do better on job test the any other group and people except that.
am i wrong for seeing the one sided veiws obama has and predicting that he has increased
his potential ending i for one would rather have king back and would gladly trade obama for such.
obama is a disgrace to equal rights and everything it stands for .
i guess i will keep some of the things i feel to myself as to not offend others.
but i would never respect a day that honers obama and would denounce him as president
no person that refuses to say the pledge of our country should be allowed to run.
he is an enemy to all freedom loving Americans.
and i can assure you i dont need any protection ill gladly leave as i came.
i donut want any special favoritism from anyone .
ive been told and will revise my approach and reread my post as to catch these things before i
send it to all to see. fair enough.

Author:  SiberD [ Wed May 21, 2008 3:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Siber's complaint

Quote:
obama make snide remarks about a whole state and is seen telling the truth and its ok.


Are you kidding? He had quite a bit of fall out from that ill advised statement and employed damage control extensively to try and make what he said as being out of context and not what he really meant. It is more of a case of Obama being an elitist and out of touch with the concerns of the every day "joe blow".

BTW, some people might consider the term "nappy headed" to be a wee bit racist but you just go ahead and write what comes naturally to ya :wink:

Author:  Donnie Mac Leod [ Wed May 21, 2008 3:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Siber's complaint

SiberD wrote:
Quote:
obama make snide remarks about a whole state and is seen telling the truth and its ok.


Are you kidding? He had quite a bit of fall out from that ill advised statement and employed damage control extensively to try and make what he said as being out of context and not what he really meant. It is more of a case of Obama being an elitist and out of touch with the concerns of the every day "joe blow".

BTW, some people might consider the term "nappy headed" to be a wee bit racist but you just go ahead and write what comes naturally to ya :wink:


To be fair SD you know Tower was writing of the incident with Imus the sports caster and is a QUOTE that he referred to.

Author:  josh knauer [ Wed May 21, 2008 4:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Siber's complaint

Ok... let's summarize this thread:

1) SiberD was tattling on another user that had already fixed/corrected their offending post. I use the term tattling specifically because I am the father of a 6 year old who we've been trying to teach that excessive tattling is obnoxious and not socially acceptable unless it is a true emergency or really serious problem. Calling someone an Oswald probably doesn't quite rate it on the crisis scale. Enough said?

2) Some random debate about something or other is continuing in the Feedback section, which is completely unacceptable. Take debate to other parts of the forum.

3) This thread has absolutely no reason for existing...

So glad I got to spend my time reading it... thanks! ](*,)

-josh

Author:  SiberD [ Wed May 21, 2008 5:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Siber's complaint

1. Absolutely untrue Josh. At the time I made the observation it was there to see not only in his original quote but in other posts referencing his post.

2. I didn't move this here, one of your mods did.

3. Says the great almighty Josh.

Edited to add: He didn't call someone an "Oswald" but said where is an "oswald" when you need one. It's a reference to Oswald as in Lee Harvey. Get it now Josh or do I need to explain it further?

Author:  animallover [ Wed May 21, 2008 6:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Siber's complaint

SiberD wrote:
1. Absolutely untrue Josh. At the time I made the observation it was there to see not only in his original quote but in other posts referencing his post.
But that by no means the situation wasn't already being addressed. It is only your assumption that it was not.

2. I didn't move this here, one of your mods did.
I did, as such complaints are supoose to be made in the feedback forum, which you already know, as opposed to derailing the threads with them. Josh would be referring to the ongoing conversation that expanded beyond the initial complaint.

3. Says the great almighty Josh.

Author:  SiberD [ Wed May 21, 2008 6:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Siber's complaint

Quote:
But that by no means the situation wasn't already being addressed. It is only your assumption that it was not.


Well then, I'm very disappointed in you AL. You usually delete my posts only after a few minutes but let a clearly racist post stay up from the afternoon of the 20th until sometime on the 21st? You're slipping.

Author:  animallover [ Wed May 21, 2008 6:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Siber's complaint

SiberD wrote:
Quote:
But that by no means the situation wasn't already being addressed. It is only your assumption that it was not.


Well then, I'm very disappointed in you AL. You usually delete my posts only after a few minutes but let a clearly racist post stay up from the afternoon of the 20th until sometime on the 21st? You're slipping.


There is a huge difference when someone that knows the rules continuously violates them and someone that is new and unaware of the rules. You could have stepped in to help out the new guy adjust, as others have done, as opposed to jumping in in the manner you have. As Josh has said you have a choice of being part of the solution or part of the problem.

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/