| EnviroLink Forum http://www.envirolink.org/forum/ |
|
| Waynes personal bias? http://www.envirolink.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8840 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | pops [ Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Waynes personal bias? |
| Author: | pops [ Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waynes personal bias? |
| Author: | pops [ Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waynes personal bias? |
| Author: | pops [ Mon Aug 18, 2008 7:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waynes personal bias? |
oh yea.....I forgot....how about AR's can derail threads with off topic complaints and critisisms and that is allowed but everyone else is told they must "post in the proper forum" Or why is it that AR's can openly argue with a moderator and their is no offical action for that and it is not only allowed but it is encouraged and Wayne usually participates right along with them. 
|
|
| Author: | Wayne Stollings [ Mon Aug 18, 2008 7:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waynes personal bias? |
| Author: | Wayne Stollings [ Mon Aug 18, 2008 7:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waynes personal bias? |
The rest boils down to the lack of understanding of what a personal attack is and is not, what is arguing over a ruling and what is not, and possibly a few other details that are not important enough to bring up at this time. |
|
| Author: | josh knauer [ Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waynes personal bias? |
Pops... I don't really see it, especially from the examples you are providing. To be clear, there's no way for us to find every violation of every rule, it is perfectly reasonable for all moderators to decide how they wish to react to rules violations when they see them. More importantly, the community should respond to these issues in a mature and as positive a way possible. This would make it unnecessary for moderators to have to get involved. Nitpicking the actions of a specific moderator, especially at this time, seems a bit too contrived for my tastes. Sorry you don't like the actions, but I don't see any serious issue here. -josh |
|
| Author: | pops [ Mon Aug 18, 2008 9:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waynes personal bias? |
| Author: | pops [ Mon Aug 18, 2008 9:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waynes personal bias? |
| Author: | pops [ Mon Aug 18, 2008 9:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waynes personal bias? |
| Author: | jhawk [ Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waynes personal bias? |
I do not remember the length exactly, but only four paragraphs seems a bit too short from my memory the whole piece seems more in line. What is not tied to memeory is the fact there was no warning issued for this, I just edited the piece and noted it instead of deleting is as we are allowed to do under the rules.[/quote] The lenght nor editing, is not at issue here (according to the rules 1 paragraph is allowed plus the conecting link). What is at issue is your allowing the AR members to post near volumes while editing others at will.[/quote] ********************* In the quote mentioned here, I posted 4 paragraphs out of 28. QED |
|
| Author: | pops [ Mon Aug 18, 2008 12:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waynes personal bias? |
| Author: | Wayne Stollings [ Mon Aug 18, 2008 12:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waynes personal bias? |
| Author: | pops [ Mon Aug 18, 2008 12:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waynes personal bias? |
| Author: | josh knauer [ Mon Aug 18, 2008 4:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Waynes personal bias? |
Ok... you've vented your frustration at getting in trouble for a personal attack against another user and it is not really going anywhere. Perhaps this can conclude this thread? |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|