EnviroLink Forum
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/

mild irritation re new rule on quoting copyrighted articles
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9402
Page 2 of 2

Author:  jhawk [ Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: mild irritation re new rule on quoting copyrighted articles

pops wrote:
Fosgate wrote:
Pops, you've gotten my interpretation and Josh's position on the matter. Continuing to question and debate it is no longer appropriate.

And neither is in line with usage of conventional English language and wording My suggestion is if you want no more than two sentences… then say that in the rules. ](*,)


**************************
I agree with you Pops, but it isn't worth risking a warning for now is it ?

:( :( :( :( :(

Author:  josh knauer [ Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: mild irritation re new rule on quoting copyrighted articles

pops wrote:
Fosgate wrote:
Pops, you've gotten my interpretation and Josh's position on the matter. Continuing to question and debate it is no longer appropriate.

And neither is in line with usage of conventional English language and wording My suggestion is if you want no more than two sentences… then say that in the rules. ](*,)


Pops... you are not getting the point here. Two sentences might actually be a copyright violation. I am not going to tell someone they are allowed to post two sentences because I could be encouraging you to violate others' copyrights. It might be appropriate for us to say no more than 2 will ever be allowed, but there are nuances in this that I don't wish to stomp on.


-josh

Page 2 of 2 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/