EnviroLink Forum

Then, we need to restore soil nutrient if nitrogen and phosphorus are critical.

It is easy to see on the CO2 charts, the seasonal fluctuation of ~3 ppm, is what the Earth's plant life can absorb. In a healthy biosphere there are plants that increase with more CO2 while others are less affected. At a normal max of 280ppm, nature has been unable to absorb the massive influx from fossil fuel burning especially after 1950. 120ppm up over the last 200 years.
We are many trillions of trees short of that needed.
In studying ecology it was a general rule that CO2 and O2 stayed in a balance. The thing missing was catastrophism. That comes from study of geology. In this case, green growth can not keep up with CO2 gain.
Human fossil fuel burning and gross overpopulation is a catastrophe for the biosphere. In progress!

_________________
"With every decision, think seven generations ahead of the consequences of your actions" Ute rule of life.
“We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children”― Chief Seattle
“Those Who Have the Privilege to Know Have the Duty to Act”…Albert Einstein

Short answer....no.
Nature works in cycles , modern human societies break those cycles by moving artificial nutrients in and production out of any given location, then instead of returning the nutrients in their waste to the land ,it is mostly flushed into the ocean.
Until we reorganize food production systems into cycles that fit natural patterns, we are on a downward spiral of biomass production as energy sources shrink.