EnviroLink Forum
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/

Climat Change basics
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=14612
Page 2 of 2

Author:  Fosgate [ Fri Jul 01, 2011 8:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Climat Change basics

Iz gon' git hawt!

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Climat Change basics

Fosgate wrote:
Iz gon' git hawt!


Iz alreddy hawt an gonna git hawtr ....

Author:  Johhny Electriglide [ Sat Jul 23, 2011 3:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Climat Change basics

Wayne Stollings wrote:
Climate Change: Evidence

Image

The timeline error bar question is moot in this example.
This stuff has been irrefutable, yet we have some numbskull now here trying to use garbage to put doubt, instead of going solar like I did 13 years ago. Like an overbreeder trying to debunk overpopulation, reminds me of the A-wipes that were at TES. :x :x :x :x

Author:  Johhny Electriglide [ Sat Jul 23, 2011 5:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Climat Change basics

Wayne Stollings wrote:
The recent CO2 concentration increase in the atmosphere.

Image

The seasonal cycle and the average trend

^^^^^

Author:  Johhny Electriglide [ Sun Jul 24, 2011 11:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Climat Change basics

Wayne Stollings wrote:
The temperature v solar output and CO2 comparison


Image

More real data

Author:  Johhny Electriglide [ Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Climat Change basics

Or just send those needing education here;
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/ar ... tart-here/
instead of engaging in pointless arguments........ ](*,) :razz:

Author:  Johhny Electriglide [ Fri Aug 19, 2011 11:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Climat Change basics

Johhny Electriglide wrote:
Wayne Stollings wrote:
Climate Change: Evidence

Image

The timeline error bar question is moot in this example.
This stuff has been irrefutable, yet we have some numbskull now here trying to use garbage to put doubt, instead of going solar like I did 13 years ago. Like an overbreeder trying to debunk overpopulation, reminds me of the A-wipes that were at TES. :x :x :x :x

ANOTHER garbage head here!!! Who let the dogs in?!!!

Author:  Johhny Electriglide [ Sun Aug 28, 2011 1:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Climat Change basics

Wayne Stollings wrote:
The recent CO2 concentration increase in the atmosphere.

Image

The seasonal cycle and the average trend

Looking at the seasonal cycle, we see the true CO2 absorptive ability of the biosphere. The present 295ppm is significantly higher than the 180ppm average of the last 1.1 million years, and significantly higher than the 230ppm of the max in the range of that period. Yet you still have denialists here thinking or pushing that humans are not to blame for the malevolent climate changes of now and worse in the relatively near future. This used to be a forum free of such nonsense as spewed by snow and cotton. :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
Monitoring stations across the Arctic this spring are measuring more than 400 parts per million of the heat-trapping gas in the atmosphere. The number isn't quite a surprise, because it's been rising at an accelerating pace. Years ago, it passed the 350 ppm mark that many scientists say is the highest safe level for carbon dioxide. It now stands globally at 395.

So far, only the Arctic has reached that 400 level, but the rest of the world will follow soon.

"The fact that it's 400 is significant," said Jim Butler, global monitoring director at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Earth System Research Lab in Boulder, Colo. "It's just a reminder to everybody that we haven't fixed this and we're still in trouble."

Carbon dioxide is the chief greenhouse gas and stays in the atmosphere for 100 years. Some carbon dioxide is natural, mainly from decomposing dead plants and animals. Before the Industrial Age, levels were around 275 parts per million.

For more than 60 years, readings have been in the 300s, except in urban areas, where levels are skewed. The burning of fossil fuels, such as coal for electricity and oil for gasoline, has caused the overwhelming bulk of the man-made increase in carbon in the air, scientists say.

Page 2 of 2 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/