EnviroLink Forum

Community • Ecology • Connection
It is currently Tue Oct 21, 2014 1:24 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:58 pm 
Offline
EnviroLink Volunteer
EnviroLink Volunteer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:45 pm
Posts: 20562
Location: Southeastern US
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/ ... 122811.php

Predictions of the loss of animal and plant diversity around the world are common under models of future climate change. But a new study shows that because these climate models don't account for species competition and movement, they could grossly underestimate future extinctions.

"We have really sophisticated meteorological models for predicting climate change," says ecologist Mark Urban, the study's lead author. "But in real life, animals move around, they compete, they parasitize each other and they eat each other. The majority of our predictions don't include these important interactions."

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:58 pm 
Offline
EnviroLink Volunteer
EnviroLink Volunteer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:45 pm
Posts: 20562
Location: Southeastern US
http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/ ... hort?rss=1

Abstract

Most climate change predictions omit species interactions and interspecific variation in dispersal. Here, we develop a model of multiple competing species along a warming climatic gradient that includes temperature-dependent competition, differences in niche breadth and interspecific differences in dispersal ability. Competition and dispersal differences decreased diversity and produced so-called ‘no-analogue’ communities, defined as a novel combination of species that does not currently co-occur. Climate change altered community richness the most when species had narrow niches, when mean community-wide dispersal rates were low and when species differed in dispersal abilities. With high interspecific dispersal variance, the best dispersers tracked climate change, out-competed slower dispersers and caused their extinction. Overall, competition slowed the advance of colonists into newly suitable habitats, creating lags in climate tracking. We predict that climate change will most threaten communities of species that have narrow niches (e.g. tropics), vary in dispersal (most communities) and compete strongly. Current forecasts probably underestimate climate change impacts on biodiversity by neglecting competition and dispersal differences.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 12:48 pm 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:59 am
Posts: 2289
Location: Central Colorado
A good prediction I read 6 years ago, said that Anthropocene Thermal Max will kill off 87% of all species within 500 years. I suppose playing with models has led to predictions of 80% and others to 90%. Then there is the runaway greenhouse if all fossil fuel is burned, and a planet devoid of life.
I think the population crash of humans will preclude burning all the fossil fuels. The worse than PETM conditions (when there was a ~30% or more ELE), will most likely take place because people will not lower their fossil fuel and other burning enough before they have a 90-95% die off. The survivors will still burn fossil fuel, but not enough to cause a runaway greenhouse effect.
I have seen some ridiculous models where they are oblivious to the tipping points of Arctic ice loss albedo effects and tundra methane releases becoming self-sustaining. The tipping points are already in process of being breached with a 1*C average rise. Even with total stopping of HGHGs today, another .4*C is in the system and will probably take us past the tipping points. The minimum predictions of +2*C, and others higher to some sort of stabilization, are mere fantasies. +2*C and the methane turnover reaction will take place ten times faster than PETM, and higher temperature with more CH4 sequestered now than 55 million years ago. (Hanson, "Storms of My Grandchildren").

_________________
"With every decision, think seven generations ahead of the consequences of your actions" Ute rule of life.
“We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children”― Chief Seattle
“Those Who Have the Privilege to Know Have the Duty to Act”…Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group