The blame lies with industry a lot more. Not thinking of future consequences of what they were doing, the greed of advertising and profiteering. The rest lies in plain old ignorant, uncaring over-breeding past the long term sustainable level of humanity to the point of a massive die off ahead, followed later by the prolonged effects of pollution---thermageddon and ELE completion.
http://dieoff.org/page14.htm http://www.populationmedia.org/ Population Media Center - Acting for Change
http://www.populationmedia.org/issue...e-environment/ Population Media Center - Population and the Environment
http://www.populationmedia.org/issue...n-and-poverty/ Population Media Center - Population and Poverty
http://www.populationmedia.org/issue...ater-scarcity/ Population Media Center - Population and Food and Water Scarcity
Overpopulation of now=poverty, environmental carnage, food and water scarcity---and it is getting worse every year.
http://populationpress.org/Ann's suggestions which would reduce HGHG production 80% are not good enough when 90% by 2020 is needed to have a chance at stopping the passing of the methane turnover process tipping point, when we began to be at it in 2009. Along with that, mathematically it would take an immediate moratorium of having kids for nearly a whole generation, followed by 1 child families until sustainability is reached, to prevent mass die off. Knowing human psychology, they will keep on with business as usual until die off from 2030 to 2070, then thermageddon a thousand years later for survivors to face. An extinction worse than 65 million years ago.