EnviroLink Forum

My advice for any essay is to know your terms. Let me help.

Glossary of Climate terms

Term or phrase = Translation

See Bloggs et al 2003 = One day we might read it too

Bloggs 2009= Hoped you wouldn't mention that

Global = Bits of the Northern Hemisphere studied

Regional = Our map

Ocean acidity = Ocean alkalinity

Increasing acidity = Reduced alkalinity

Low pH seawater = Seawater with hydrochloric acid added

High pH seawater = Seawater with no acid added

High morbidity = Buggers don't like acid.

W/M^2 = Watts per square meter

Watt = One joule per second

Watts = That damn blogger

Rainbow Bridge= It is possible to piss off the French

Proxy= Tree rings, ice cores or sediments

Tree rings= The "lonesome pine"

Yamal= A few "lonesome pines"

The Hockey Stick= Two graphs for the price of one

"Nature trick"= A surreptitious grafting operation

Statistical technique= Smooth the hell out of it

Uniform priors= Dunno, just smooth the hell out of it

Mediaeval Warm Period= We got rid of that (see Statistical technique)

Little Ice Age= An urban myth (see Statistical technique)

Roman Warm Period= Man, that was, like, ages ago

Sediment density plot= You mean it's that way up?

Ice cores= Compressed ice layers with minute amounts of trapped air

CO2 in ice cores= 0.03% of the minute amounts of trapped air

Ice core proxy= A scientific myth

97% of scientists= 97% of 77 scientists

Almost all scientists= The ones we know who agree with us

All scientists= The Hockey Team

_________________
Potato chip enthusiast.

If you follow that "scientific" advice, you will be able to follow the radical conservative's version of "science", which is whatever they make up at the time to try to make a point. To follow real science you will not need such uninformed "translations".

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

Round two.

IPCC= An exclusive club for retired railway engineers

IPCC review stage= Fixing spelling mistakes & checking for 2035

IPCC report= Vast report written by 97% of scientists and WWF

WWF= World Wide Fund for Nature, depending on the size of the collecting tin

WWF reports= Magazine articles and telephone interviews

Greenpeace= Misguided geeks with a multi-million budget

Environmentalist= The clue's in the mentalist bit

Row-to-the-Pole= Dragging a heavy boat over the ice to nowhere near the Pole

Consensus= The bane of true science and research

Peer review= Pal review or a favour repaid

Science reporter= Reject from the sports desk

Environmental reporter= Reject from the fashion desk

Climate-change reporter= Teaboy who was gettin' just too smart

Natural variability= Our models don't work

Uncertainty= We don't know why our models don't work

Almost certain= There's a definite possibility

Very likely= We believe it anyway

Could= Probably won't

May= Almost certainly won't

Possible= Unlikely

Might= Definitely won't

Slightly lower trend= No trend

Flattened off= Declined

Downward spiral= Slow decline

Obvious trend= Well I can see it

Rapid increase= Slight upward trend

Continued warming= Cooling

Rapid warming= Some warming

Projection= Best guess (see "Climate model" below)

Best estimate= Guess

Best guess= We don't know

Guess= We're sure we don't know

_________________
Potato chip enthusiast.

Too bad the peanut gallery is impacting a serious thread, but ignorance is all some have to try to counter real science.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

Round three.

We don't know= Oh God our help in ages past

Good understanding= As far as we know

Low understanding= Zero understanding

Poor understanding= We'll shake the dice

Indeterminate= Even we couldn't fudge it

Correlation= The plots are almost the same shape

Good correlation= If you tilt your head to the right and squint

Zero correlation= The "hockey stick" (q.v.) graph

More research needed= Keep the funding coming in

Detailed research= The new guy is very good (Marcott)

Unprecedented= Take our word for it

Caveat= Must mention global warming

Rebutted= Didn't mention global warming

Temperature dataset= Readings from airport runways and A/C vents

Urban heat island= The temperature of asphalt and concrete

Summer= Global warming

Winter= Natural variability

Precipitation= Rain, snow, and what flies off fans

Snow= See it while you can

Rain= A good thing

Flood= Too much of a good thing

Tornadoes= Never seen 'em before this year

Weather= What we're getting today

Extreme weather = What we often got before

Climate= Last week in Austin, Texas

Living memory= The last ten years

Since records began= Since we first had the internet

Mean sea-level= The sea's always pretty mean

Sea-level rise= The tide's coming in


Extreme sea-level rise= The tide's coming in real fast

Future sea-level rise= Gotta up the ante

Extreme sea-level rise= We ain't gonna need street-cleaners

Climate model= A form of computerized astrology

_________________
Potato chip enthusiast.

Hi MiltonBanana,

It seems as if either you or your spirit (or even "the" spirit) knew more things about me than the others on this forum.
On my homepage, I really use words like "may", "could", etc. but it's because I want to be
MORE precise while trying to convey my knowledge and not more.

For essay contests, I usually try to be use more correct English than on my homepage,
and I'm going to correct my English language errors even on my homepage too, if my book will be ready.

_________________
Environmentalism: http://fecowebs.ourproject.org
Justice: by ballpoint pen.

Maybe Bananas Milty has a brain tumor.
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_an ... ument.html

He certainly likes to cut down and name call climate scientists and environmentalists.

You are NOT being funny, but on a bad roll. Get off it, or get out, or both. Go back to the open forum, at least we are mostly allies there. This whole thread should be deleted.

_________________
"With every decision, think seven generations ahead of the consequences of your actions" Ute rule of life.
“We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children”
― Chief Seattle

This is a first. A thread not of my making. I think its great. Now the gods of environment have directed me to keep in comic. Everyone knows if it really funny an element of truth must by employed. Which is what I have been doing here. Okay. No problem. This really opens up future comedy bits too. But, I still need to help out AF2. Continuing on with glossary and terms= translations.

Regional climate model= A less accurate form of climate model

Multiple models= One of them might be right

Multiple model runs= We picked the results we wanted

Model averages= A total nonsense

Model verification= We'll get around to it someday

Solar radiation= What the hell's the sun got to do with it?

Sunspots Damn= I've gone blind in one eye

Sunspot cycle= The latest model with GPS and everything

No - the Sunspot cycle= Oh - wiggles up an' down, doesn't do much

ENSO= We don't do ocean cycles

Carbon cycle= The "missing sink" is there somewhere

Arctic warming= It might be a bit less cold there

Antarctic warming= A bit less cold at the tip of the peninsula

Ice shelf collapse= Mind you, we never looked before....

Glacier= A mega-version of what's in your gin-an'-tonic

Melting glaciers= The very few studied; i.e. all of them

_________________
Potato chip enthusiast.

https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=4 ... &zw&atsh=1

Cut and paste this as a thread to discuss in the open forum. Less chance of getting yourself banned for stupidity.

_________________
"With every decision, think seven generations ahead of the consequences of your actions" Ute rule of life.
“We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children”
― Chief Seattle

Actually, this forum topic was probably moved here by a moderator at EnviroLink
from a reply to my post about environmental essay competitions.

I wrote that the spirit might be responsible because in 2011-2012, I wrote a poem
to a humour poetry contest about "Humour Theory" and its last words were
"I should not eat too much from imported banana."

By the way, I cancelled my entry because I realized later that not everything in the poem was strictly true.
(However, I really had a bad stomach once I ate a lot of imported banana in the time of the Soviet Union.)

This year I planned to enter that competition again but I decided that there are more important things than that.
However, I still remember that I wanted to write about a conflict of Restless Deja Vu, the dark samurai ninja Versus Lucky Slywalker, the Faithless.

Now I think that poem is not a form in which one can easily convey noble thoughts, that's why I would write essays instead.

About Milton Banana's humouros criticism, well, I may be able to learn from that, because the correction of errors are handy even from an enemy.

In my homepage, I wrote a lot about "environmentalist" people, however, I meant people who are "more beneficial to the environment than the others in either an active or in a passive way". Well, in Hungarian, "környezetvédő" people are people who are "beneficial to the environment in an active way", and "környezetbarát" people are people who are "beneficial to the environment in a passive way". However, now I got the suspicion that in English, the "environmentalist" people are just those who are "beneficial to the environment in an active and scientific way."
That said, I will probably check this later and correct my homepage anyway before its final version.

_________________
Environmentalism: http://fecowebs.ourproject.org
Justice: by ballpoint pen.

Johhny we agree on gun issues. I respect you being that you served this country. You’ll always get a pass as far as I’m concerned. I respect military service that much. But, as far as anyone getting banned. If this forum cannot support one member of the loyal opposition than ban me now.

_________________
Potato chip enthusiast.

The Mod got rid of your junk in the thread on writing a college essay.
"certainly likes to cut down and name call climate scientists and environmentalists." That SHOULD get you banned, but Wayne seems to like wasting bandwidth on useless arguments with denialists.

We need a Steady State World Economy-----years ago!!!
The thing people as a whole don't get is how much emissions reductions must be done and how fast to avoid the worst possible outcome, an extinction of nearly 90% of life on Earth, including humans. HGHG emissions MUST reduce, by what ever means it takes, 90% in 3 to 11 years max, or that worst case is what faces future generations. 70% is from burning fossil fuels(40% COAL, 30% OIL) and 27% from slash and burn agriculture, and 3% from too many farm animals.
Other human pollution and depletion is bad, but not on this scale of consequences. It is already really, in all practical logic, to stop the human population die-off starting even as early as the 2030s and for sure by the late 2040s---after crossing tipping points of unstoppable natural positive feedback loops if emissions are not reduced enough in time. The pitiful survivors will face increasingly more miserable life as AETM approaches.
That is a higher morality that people must attain, where sustainability becomes a Holy Word and future generations mean more than the extra people and over use of resources now. A morality that decreasing emissions enough in time is the most important thing anyone, any group, any country, or any corporation can do. Education to reduce these emissions and still survive, get rid of selfish greed, and get rid of other beliefs and behaviors that hold humanity back from achieving the goal of continued life for ours and most other species.

_________________
"With every decision, think seven generations ahead of the consequences of your actions" Ute rule of life.
“We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children”
― Chief Seattle

What's even worse are scientists (or untrained, outspoken proponents of it) attempting to counter real science. There's nothing I love more than putting these folks in their place before I learn that they have a degree in philosophy and a career driving a lift truck.

_________________
TANG SOO!

I was involved in a discussion in what was supposed to be a professional forum until it devolved into just name calling.

The "professionals" that were taking turns at attacking science turned out to be a community college instructor, a very undereducated field technician, a guy looking for a job in the field, and some manager. They used various attacks themselves and those excluded the attacks by their supporters, but that small issue was ignored as was the evidence of the use of logical fallacies, incorrect math, and anecdotal information as general fact. They may still be going on making replies to me as far as I know.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

I actually miss gov't contracting. It really hits me, having gone from what was the highest per capita PhD gov't installation in the country (scary huh?) to the private sector firm where I am now. Most here didn't go any further than a 4 year degree. The ones that did probably went MBA. Not that they aren't dynamic and bright, but those folks working for Uncle Sam were the sharpest scientists I've ever known. I'm happy to have worked with them and especially glad that I was able to show them a thing or two...while I was in my 20's.

_________________
TANG SOO!