Milton Banana wrote:
All you fence sitters please review your logical fallacies. Ad hominem to be specific. And here is a few quotes. http://www.c3headlines.com/quotes-from- ... ptics.html
Quote by Nobel Prize Winner For Chemistry, Kary Mullis: “Global warmers predict that global warming is coming, and our emissions are to blame. They do that to keep us worried about our role in the whole thing. If we aren't worried and guilty, we might not pay their salaries. It's that simple.
Quote by Nobel Prize Winner For Physics, Ivar Giaever: “I am a skeptic…Global warming has become a new religion.”
So why post logical fallacies if you know they are fallacies unless you are trolling?
Quote by Dennis Hollars, astrophysicist: "What I'd do with the IPCC report is to put it in the trash can because that's all it's worth....carbon dioxide was an insignificant component of the earth's atmosphere and that, rather than being the purveyor of doom it is currently viewed as today, it is needed in order for plants to grow....'Mars' atmosphere is about 95 percent CO2 and has no global warming.”
An astrophysicist who seems to purposefully attempt to mislead? Venus has an atmosphere which is mostly CO2 and has a significant amount of GHE warming.
Just a few. Please follow the link for many more. And, this to add. Please review.http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot ... -ipcc.html
•The two satellite records continue to show cooling;
•All three surface air temperature records continue to show negative temperature trend for the last 5 and 10 years; however
•as seen by the Mauna Loa record below CO2 continues its rise:
For those too ignorant of the science to understand there has never been a claim of a direct correlation with just CO2 concentrations. the rest of us understand.
CO2 is a trace gas, and cannot do what the religious environ-METAL-ists say that it does. No way
So how DO you explain the GHE since the temperature of the planet is far warmer than it should be with just a blackbody radiation heating?