Just trying to provide some perspective. Man's carbon is not the only carbon going in this system. There is plenty of carbon before we arrived on the scene. Yes, I was refering to the total carbon budget. Man's contribution is not insignificant, but it is trival really. Anyone reading just google "total carbon budget" and educate yourself. Or let me provide a NASA study.
Here is a look at a NASA carbon study. Clearly showing nature provides much more carbon into our system. No question about it. Basically it breaks down as follows.
Total CO2
Surface Ocean contains about 1,000 Gigatons of CO2
Intermediate and deep ocean contains about 38,000 Gt of CO2
In contrast to the atmosphere containing about 750 GT of CO2
Vegetation, Soils, and Detritus contains about 2,200 GT of CO2
Each year, the surface ocean and atmosphere exchange an estimated 90 GT C;
vegetation and the atmosphere, 60 GT C; marine biota and the surface ocean,
50 GT C; and the surface ocean and the intermediate and deep oceans, 100 GT
C."
Mankind emits about 8.5 GT of CO2 per year.
The atmosphere CO2 is cycled out in less than 8 years.
CO2 is NOT pollution.
770,000 mmt of CO2 is from NATURAL SOURCE
23,100 mmt of CO2 is from MAN MADE SOURCE
770,000 + 23,100 = 793,000 TOTAL
Absorption is 781,400 mmt
So as I have clearly demonstrated nature produces 96 percent of the carbon in our system. It doesn't matter really CO2 just cannot do what the climate change advocated say it does. No way it is just not possible.
Here is another carbon study in case your on the fence.
Carbon budgets are to be avoided at all costs if you want to conceal the true nature of climate.