EnviroLink Forum
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/

Thoughts on 2016 being the hottest year ever?
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=25358
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Milton Banana [ Fri Jan 20, 2017 3:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thoughts on 2016 being the hottest year ever?

Here are a few thoughts.

https://realclimatescience.com/2016/03/ ... -58-years/

Quote:
In their “hottest year ever” press briefing, NOAA included this graph, which stated that they have a 58 year long radiosonde temperature record. But they only showed the last 37 years in the graph.Here is why they are hiding the rest of the data. The earlier data showed as much pre-1979 cooling as the post-1979 warming.The omission of this data from the NOAA report, is just their latest attempt to defraud the public. NOAA’s best data shows no warming for 60 years. But it gets worse. The graph in the NOAA report shows about 0.5C warming from 1979 to 2010, but their original published data shows little warming during that period.


https://realclimatescience.com/2016/12/ ... tampering/

Quote:
The first problem with their analysis is that the US had very little hot weather in 2016. The percentage of hot days was below average, and ranked 80th since 1895. Only 4.4% of days were over 95°F, compared with the long term average of 4.9%. Climate Central is conflating mild temperatures with hot ones. The problem with the NOAA graph is that it is fake data. NOAA creates the warming trend by altering the data. The NOAA raw data shows no warming over the past century


Quote:
The hockey stick of adjustments since 1970 is due almost entirely to NOAA fabricating missing station data. In 2016, more than 42% of their monthly station data was missing, so they simply made it up. This is easy to identify because they mark fabricated temperatures with an “E” in their database.

https://climatism.wordpress.com/categor ... tampering/
http://www.climatedepot.com/2016/12/28/ ... tampering/

http://www.newsmax.com/LarryBell/CATO-D ... id/712153/

Quote:
Approximately 300 people including scientists, engineers and other experts, about half with doctorate degrees, have petitioned U.S. House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, to carefully investigate suspiciously overheated climate temperature book-cooking by the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

Signers included 25 climate or atmospheric scientists, 23 geologists, 51 engineers, 74 physicists, and 12 economists.

One was a Nobel laureate physicist, two were Apollo astronauts . . . and another was me.

Referring to a 2015 NOAA study purporting to having eliminated a nearly two-decade-long “hiatus” of flat global temperatures, the signatories asked Smith’s committee to ensure that federal agencies observe scientific Data Quality Act (DQA) guidelines established by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget.

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Fri Jan 20, 2017 3:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Thoughts on 2016 being the hottest year ever?

Milton Banana wrote:
Here are a few thoughts.


and none of them really are applicable if you understand what is being discussed .....

Quote:
https://realclimatescience.com/2016/03/noaa-radiosonde-data-shows-no-warming-for-58-years/

Quote:
In their “hottest year ever” press briefing, NOAA included this graph, which stated that they have a 58 year long radiosonde temperature record. But they only showed the last 37 years in the graph.Here is why they are hiding the rest of the data. The earlier data showed as much pre-1979 cooling as the post-1979 warming.The omission of this data from the NOAA report, is just their latest attempt to defraud the public. NOAA’s best data shows no warming for 60 years. But it gets worse. The graph in the NOAA report shows about 0.5C warming from 1979 to 2010, but their original published data shows little warming during that period.


Odd that this tries to compare the upper range of the average of the entire column to the individual sections. Not exactly a correct comparison by any means.

Quote:
https://realclimatescience.com/2016/12/100-of-us-warming-is-due-to-noaa-data-tampering/

Quote:
The first problem with their analysis is that the US had very little hot weather in 2016. The percentage of hot days was below average, and ranked 80th since 1895. Only 4.4% of days were over 95°F, compared with the long term average of 4.9%. Climate Central is conflating mild temperatures with hot ones. The problem with the NOAA graph is that it is fake data. NOAA creates the warming trend by altering the data. The NOAA raw data shows no warming over the past century


The US temperatures to the world average? Not even apples to oranges.

Quote:
Quote:
The hockey stick of adjustments since 1970 is due almost entirely to NOAA fabricating missing station data. In 2016, more than 42% of their monthly station data was missing, so they simply made it up. This is easy to identify because they mark fabricated temperatures with an “E” in their database.

https://climatism.wordpress.com/categor ... tampering/
http://www.climatedepot.com/2016/12/28/ ... tampering/


More of the same comparison attempts.

Quote:
http://www.newsmax.com/LarryBell/CATO-DQA-MIT-NOAA/2016/02/01/id/712153/

Quote:
Approximately 300 people including scientists, engineers and other experts, about half with doctorate degrees, have petitioned U.S. House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, to carefully investigate suspiciously overheated climate temperature book-cooking by the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

Signers included 25 climate or atmospheric scientists, 23 geologists, 51 engineers, 74 physicists, and 12 economists.

One was a Nobel laureate physicist, two were Apollo astronauts . . . and another was me.

Referring to a 2015 NOAA study purporting to having eliminated a nearly two-decade-long “hiatus” of flat global temperatures, the signatories asked Smith’s committee to ensure that federal agencies observe scientific Data Quality Act (DQA) guidelines established by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget.


No data just questions by deniers?

Author:  Johhny Electriglide [ Sat Jan 21, 2017 9:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Thoughts on 2016 being the hottest year ever?

We are at a point where EVERY year will be a record from the previous year. This is what exponential means, dipwad. Apparently, the temperature rise from the year before was .07*F. Now, compared to PETM's .025*C per century. Convert .07F=.126C, now times 100 years, 12.6*C. Divide by .025 = 520 times the speed of PETM's methane turnover event. Consider the Permian ELE was about 3 times faster that PETM, and you get an idea, Miltie. You have at most 4 years to live, unless you are a billionaire and can afford the 20 year underground ticket. #-o

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/