EnviroLink Forum
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/

Wayne stollings
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=17146
Page 1 of 1

Author:  mothy [ Fri Mar 09, 2012 10:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Wayne stollings

Have you ever given an animal a better life?

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Fri Mar 09, 2012 10:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Wayne stollings

Yes, I have given many animals a better life. We currently have two rescued cats and two rescued dogs in our home. We have rescued several other animals over the years.

When I lived at home on the farm I rescued a stray dog, which was not common for good reason. The dog rewarded me by killing some of our chickens. Because it was my choice to allow the dog to stay it was also my responsibility to correct the situation. The dog went to the afterlife, which if not better was as painless as I could make it.

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Fri Mar 09, 2012 10:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Wayne stollings

I enforced the right of my chickens to only die to feed me and my family. :mrgreen: :-

Author:  GoGreenCO [ Fri Mar 09, 2012 10:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Wayne stollings

And that they be killed humanely.

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Fri Mar 09, 2012 10:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Wayne stollings

GoGreenCO wrote:
And that they be killed humanely.


Are you saying the natural death as provided by a dog of hawk is not humane?

Author:  GoGreenCO [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Wayne stollings

Yes.

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Wayne stollings

GoGreenCO wrote:
Yes.


So humane death is not natural, but not acceptable to some because they just cannot be pleased? :mrgreen:

Author:  GoGreenCO [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Wayne stollings

Yes.

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Wayne stollings

GoGreenCO wrote:
Yes.


Thus, there is no compelling reason presented other than "just because".

Author:  GoGreenCO [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Wayne stollings

Because you wouldn't be a douche bag.

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Wayne stollings

GoGreenCO wrote:
Because you wouldn't be a douche bag.


That has no relation at all to the discussion. The fact you wish to act as one does not make your case any more appealing.

Author:  GoGreenCO [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Wayne stollings

I'm a smaller douche bag.

This is a big douchebag.

Image

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Wayne stollings

GoGreenCO wrote:
I'm a smaller douche bag.


That could be debated.

Author:  GoGreenCO [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Wayne stollings

You'd have to define your terms very well if you want to win.

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Wayne stollings

GoGreenCO wrote:
You'd have to define your terms very well if you want to win.


Not always, but it was you who tried to introduce several poorly defined terms. :-$

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/