Irradiation...wow. That really screws up the "organic-ness" of a food, doesn't it?
| EnviroLink Forum http://www.envirolink.org/forum/ |
|
| Organic huh? http://www.envirolink.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=20451 |
Page 1 of 8 |
| Author: | Fosgate [ Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Organic huh? |
Study finds organic food is no better on vitamins, nutrients Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2012/09/0 ... z25V5sfVoN |
|
| Author: | Wayne Stollings [ Tue Sep 04, 2012 8:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Organic huh? |
I saw an article on TV on this. The only difference found was an even lower level pesticides in some of the organic products. Not a lck of pesticides, just less. None of the products had a level which was a concern. The products which are normally peeled prior to use had no pesticides inside the peel. |
|
| Author: | Fosgate [ Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Organic huh? |
| Author: | Ann Vole [ Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Organic huh? |
| Author: | Johhny Electriglide [ Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Organic huh? |
From the article; "Eating organic fruits and vegetables can lower exposure to pesticides, including for children -- but the amount measured from conventionally grown produce was within safety limits, the researchers reported Monday.}}}I wonder about those 'safety limits' and about things not tested for that may come from below USP grade petro-chemical fertilizers{{{ Nor did the organic foods prove more nutritious.(???)}}}then why have I read numerous articles for years, that factory farmed food contains less nutritional value that it did back in the late 1970s{{{ Her team did find a notable(!!!) difference with antibiotic-resistant germs, a public health concern because they are harder to treat if they cause food poisoning. Specialists long have said that organic or not, the chances of bacterial contamination of food are the same, and Monday's analysis agreed. >>But when bacteria did lurk in chicken or pork, >>germs in the non-organic meats had a 33 percent higher risk of being resistant to multiple antibiotics<<<, the researchers reported Monday in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine. That finding comes amid debate over feeding animals antibiotics, not because they're sick but to fatten them up. Farmers say it's necessary to meet demand for cheap meat(because of overpopulation's demands). Public health advocates say it's one contributor to the nation's growing problem with increasingly hard-to-treat germs. Caroline Smith DeWaal, food safety director at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, counted 24 outbreaks linked to multidrug-resistant germs in food between 2000 and 2010. The government has begun steps to curb the nonmedical use of antibiotics on the farm. Organic foods account for 4.2 percent of retail food sales, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. It certifies products as organic if they meet certain requirements including being produced without synthetic pesticides or fertilizers, or routine use of antibiotics or growth hormones. Consumers can pay a lot more for some organic products but demand is rising: Organic foods accounted for $31.4 billion sales last year, according to a recent administration report. That's up from $3.6 billion in 1997. The Stanford team combed through thousands of studies to analyze the 237 that most rigorously compared organic and conventional foods. Bravata was dismayed that just 17 compared how people fared eating either diet while the rest investigated properties of the foods themselves. >>Organic produce had a 30 percent lower risk of containing detectable pesticide levels.<<" I say, everyone build Earthships and grow your own!!! I just wash the City Market stuff good and cook the meat well. I do not buy fish or other food from known contaminated sources like SE Asia. |
|
| Author: | EstellePage [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Organic huh? |
I don't think organic is supposed to mean for vitamins and minerals! It's not more of the good stuff, just less of the bad stuff. Although yeah, I was surprised when I found out that farmers are allowed to use a certain level of chemicals and still certify stuff as organic. I think, if you want truly organic fruit & veg you should grow it yourself at home! |
|
| Author: | Wayne Stollings [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 4:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Organic huh? |
Chemicals are everywhere and some are just as natural as anything else, which is why they are allowed. The problem is that too many believe natural is healthy or better for you and that is not the case. |
|
| Author: | animal-friendly [ Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Organic huh? |
| Author: | Wayne Stollings [ Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Organic huh? |
| Author: | animal-friendly [ Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Organic huh? |
| Author: | Ann Vole [ Sat Sep 08, 2012 5:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Organic huh? |
a Canadian dilemma that may be of interest to this thread: grain was marketed by a central agency for years to compete with Russian grain industry and USA subsidies. This worked while all grain was identical (no such label as "organic" used yet). Now, the grain system is not designed to handle twice as many forms of grain (to make a new organic category for each type) so organic grain farmers get the same price as regular grain and it is all dumped together in the same granaries and rail cars. Laws to protect the pricing system prohibited farmers from selling elsewhere. Organic farmers were still setting up shop (getting certified) and some local markets for organic meat were set up to buy this organic grain... but most of the grain was still dumped together with the regular grain. I know from the farmers I worked for (including my parents) that about half our grain crops were grown without pesticides because they are expensive (including fuel and labor to apply them). Good farming practices include crop rotation and persistent pesticides (those that stay in the soil) are a real pain to deal with because they will reduce yields of other crops grown on that field later. For this reason, they were rarely used. My point is that going organic is not very far from current "normal" grain farming practices here in the Canadian prairies (that statement might not apply elsewhere though). |
|
| Author: | Fosgate [ Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Organic huh? |
Irradiation...wow. That really screws up the "organic-ness" of a food, doesn't it?
|
|
| Author: | animal-friendly [ Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Organic huh? |
| Author: | Wayne Stollings [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 7:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Organic huh? |
| Author: | Fosgate [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Organic huh? |
| Page 1 of 8 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|