EnviroLink Forum
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/

assumptions confirmed
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2364
Page 1 of 3

Author:  wijim [ Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:34 pm ]
Post subject:  assumptions confirmed

bet we have seen the last of sianblooz.


sianblooz, if i have mistakenly identified you as the "wrong" person i would offer an apology.

if i have not, it is of poor form to repeat the same faux pas that got you so into trouble with your prior dishonesty. but it does go to show that you are not able to exist on a board in which you can't physically delete items you want deleted, offer up support for yourself by using multiple handles in which to show a fake lot of support for yourself. but then again its just another bridge burned.

bet em, or austin wont last long here either barb.




for those who need em and austin clarified.....thats two more aliases used by barb aka sianblooz.

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Sun Apr 02, 2006 6:19 pm ]
Post subject: 

So there is no confirmation just the statement of opinion?

Author:  Bean [ Sun Apr 02, 2006 6:22 pm ]
Post subject: 

Wayne Stollings wrote:
So there is no confirmation just the statement of opinion?


No, it's a bet. :D

Author:  wijim [ Sun Apr 02, 2006 6:22 pm ]
Post subject: 

Wayne Stollings wrote:
So there is no confirmation just the statement of opinion?


lots of evidence along with it.

um....i wont get into one very strong piece of evidence as its somewhat of a privacy issue wayne. but trust me if you'd like, don't trust me if you can't.

if i felt right about typing that evidence...you can be sure i would. many here have seen me do it when there were not ethical privacy issues to be concerned with.

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Sun Apr 02, 2006 6:26 pm ]
Post subject: 

wijim wrote:
Wayne Stollings wrote:
So there is no confirmation just the statement of opinion?


lots of evidence along with it.

um....i wont get into one very strong piece of evidence as its somewhat of a privacy issue wayne. but trust me if you'd like, don't trust me if you can't.

if i felt right about typing that evidence...you can be sure i would. many here have seen me do it when there were not ethical privacy issues to be concerned with.


Just pointing out what you wrote and the title do not match. You still indicate something less than a confirmation in what you wrote in the post.

Author:  wijim [ Mon Apr 03, 2006 8:34 am ]
Post subject: 

confirmed to me wayne. i promised no confirmations. maybe you assumed by my title i was going to confirm something to you.

Author:  sianblooz [ Mon Apr 03, 2006 11:29 pm ]
Post subject: 

Hope you didn't put any money on that bet.

Author:  Bean [ Tue Apr 04, 2006 12:18 am ]
Post subject: 

sianblooz wrote:
Hope you didn't put any money on that bet.


I didn't, but I really wish you'd just go ahead and post as Barb. :wink:

Author:  Donnie Mac Leod [ Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:50 am ]
Post subject: 

She has posted as Barb would. . That leapord could never change it's spots ,only the name has changed the deceptive twists of personality continue..

Author:  wijim [ Tue Apr 04, 2006 10:41 am ]
Post subject: 

sianblooz wrote:
Hope you didn't put any money on that bet.


i'd put something to that bet with you.

offer proof that you are not barb aka, bran muffin, bubbfas, q, qwerty and i will forever stop posting at this board.

in agreeing to this bet, id of course ask something of you if you can not sufficiently prove otherwise.

so put forth what you would wager sianblooz. (i'd suggest that you'd acknowledge your barbness and apologize to this board for your deceit, if you lose this wager. thast's all id ask of you.)

of course i'd like a non bias person to make the ultimate decision on who has become the victor in this wager. i'd accept josh, or any combo of people who would represent either side.


the evidence supports that i am correct incidently.

Author:  oinks [ Wed Apr 05, 2006 7:46 am ]
Post subject: 

How is she supposed to prove she is NOT Barb? Post a picture? :roll: Give you a phone number in New Mexico (unlikely)?

What is the confirmation you received, and why did you start this thread if you had no intention of posting it?

Why is posting under another "username" a deceit, when Capitalist Swine (aka Festus) and I both do it?

Author:  Grace [ Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:07 am ]
Post subject: 

oinks wrote:
How is she supposed to prove she is NOT Barb? Post a picture? :roll: Give you a phone number in New Mexico (unlikely)?

What is the confirmation you received, and why did you start this thread if you had no intention of posting it?

Why is posting under another "username" a deceit, when Capitalist Swine (aka Festus) and I both do it?



Umm I have to say they're all good questions.

Author:  Donnie Mac Leod [ Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:38 am ]
Post subject: 

Grace wrote:
oinks wrote:
How is she supposed to prove she is NOT Barb? Post a picture? :roll: Give you a phone number in New Mexico (unlikely)?

What is the confirmation you received, and why did you start this thread if you had no intention of posting it?

Why is posting under another "username" a deceit, when Capitalist Swine (aka Festus) and I both do it?



Umm I have to say they're all good questions.



Do you remember Barb accusing me of hacking her board knowing that I hadn't since she deleted all the info and even the archives from the board herself because her lies caught up to her and she had to hide her deciet somehow. I figured you had grown to much to support such dishonesty Grace. The questions are good but folks who have dealt with Barb over the years and know her style of writting and inuendo know who sianblooz is. Even the claim about not knowing what to do with PM messages is so typical of her poor me style.



And you already know the answer Grace ,just as you did when Qwerty pretended not to be Barb and pulled the info on RF . You don't seem to want that trick pulled twice,but maybe I am wrong and you would pretend you don't know the difference.

Author:  wijim [ Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:52 am ]
Post subject: 

oinks wrote:
How is she supposed to prove she is NOT Barb? Post a picture? :roll: Give you a phone number in New Mexico (unlikely)?

What is the confirmation you received, and why did you start this thread if you had no intention of posting it?

Why is posting under another "username" a deceit, when Capitalist Swine (aka Festus) and I both do it?


the confirmation i recieved was in a confidential manner, others who know that when i state that type of thing (me having very strong evidence for myself) can take it to the bank. others who really have no trust in what i say basically wont believe it and im ok with that....im speaking to those who trust me.

because it was put forth that i was dog poo for me to prove otherwise, is why i posted.

new mexico is likely not the place though it says so on the profile.

the user name is not an issue when you n festus are who you are with no real history in using such as a crutch. you two are who you are and never present you are something different, nor do you hide behind such so you can lie and twist with that backing. if barb had just announced she was barb, she'd still get shit for it just due to the history, but this hiding game is just making it more apparent that she's a nut.

Author:  wijim [ Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:53 am ]
Post subject: 

Grace wrote:
oinks wrote:
How is she supposed to prove she is NOT Barb? Post a picture? :roll: Give you a phone number in New Mexico (unlikely)?

What is the confirmation you received, and why did you start this thread if you had no intention of posting it?

Why is posting under another "username" a deceit, when Capitalist Swine (aka Festus) and I both do it?



Umm I have to say they're all good questions.


no doubt about it. i actaully had to think why i posted it prior to answering...lol

Page 1 of 3 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/