EnviroLink Forum
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/

the real deal
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2365
Page 6 of 8

Author:  Amy7779311 [ Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:41 pm ]
Post subject: 

Bean wrote:
sianblooz wrote:
I said I beleive a father who would beat his child's kitten to death in front of her is dog poo.



Quit twisting Barb. Unless your reading comprehension is completely lacking, you know that Jim wrote that he didn't know his daughter was looking out the window.

You're trying to make it sound as if Jim forced her to stand there and watch him hit the dying cat with a shovel.

Knock it off. :roll:


Actually, unless I'm remembering incorrectly, he did know that she was watching from the window, having asked if she wanted to stay or go inside while he put the cat down. She chose to go inside and watch from a window.

But, no, I don't recollect anything about being forced to watch.



(feel free to correct me if I'm wrong here)

Author:  Donnie Mac Leod [ Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:42 pm ]
Post subject: 

Bean wrote:
sianblooz wrote:
I said I beleive a father who would beat his child's kitten to death in front of her is dog poo.



Quit twisting Barb. Unless your reading comprehension is completely lacking, you know that Jim wrote that he didn't know his daughter was looking out the window.

You're trying to make it sound as if Jim forced her to stand there and watch him hit the dying cat with a shovel.

Knock it off. :roll:




Quite correct Bean. Wiijim made that specific reference to not knowing.

Author:  Amy7779311 [ Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:43 pm ]
Post subject: 

Well, heck. Maybe I'm off here.

(sorry)

Author:  Bean [ Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:45 pm ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
i told her she could be there if she wanted to.
she said no. i suggested she go in the house.
she did.
i took cat tossed it in the yard went and got shovel and whacked it a few times until i was certain it was completely dead.
my daughtyer chose to watch from the window.


I can see how there could be different interpretations.

It's hard to tell if he knew she was watching or if he found out afterwards that she had been watching.

Jim?

Anyhoo, either way, the point is that it's obvious he didn't force her to watch, which is what Sianbarb is trying to imply.

Author:  Amy7779311 [ Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:47 pm ]
Post subject: 

Bean wrote:
Anyhoo, either way, the point is that it's obvious he didn't force her to watch, which is what Sianbarb is trying to imply.


Well we know better. :)

Author:  Donnie Mac Leod [ Wed Apr 05, 2006 3:17 pm ]
Post subject: 

Amy7779311 wrote:
Bean wrote:
Anyhoo, either way, the point is that it's obvious he didn't force her to watch, which is what Sianbarb is trying to imply.


Well we know better. :)




The most important point is that Wiijim did explain the choice of killing right away and not making the animal suffer for another half hour to at least an hour before the Vet finished the job. Being a part of the choice to make things less difficult and suffering to the kitten was what really matters.

Author:  sianblooz [ Wed Apr 05, 2006 11:28 pm ]
Post subject: 

Bean
Quote:
You're trying to make it sound as if Jim forced her to stand there and watch him hit the dying cat with a shovel.


Krist on a krutch, you people are incredible. This is a lie. If you want to prove I said this, go ahead. Be my guest. But you know its a lie.

Wijim said he did it in front of her. I did not make that up and its the only thing I've commented on. His own words.

Quit making up lies.

Author:  Donnie Mac Leod [ Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:03 am ]
Post subject: 

sianblooz wrote:
Bean
Quote:
You're trying to make it sound as if Jim forced her to stand there and watch him hit the dying cat with a shovel.


Krist on a krutch, you people are incredible. This is a lie. If you want to prove I said this, go ahead. Be my guest. But you know its a lie.

Wijim said he did it in front of her. I did not make that up and its the only thing I've commented on. His own words.

Quit making up lies.



However your presentation is suspect as always Sianblooz.

This is what Jim did say.


i told her she could be there if she wanted to.
she said no. i suggested she go in the house.
she did.

i took cat tossed it in the yard went and got shovel and whacked it a few times until i was certain it was completely dead.
my daughtyer chose to watch from the window.


My impression was that Wiijim didn't actually know the daughter watched as he was so focused on the kitten and didn't actually consider that the child was watching till the deed was done.

Author:  Amy7779311 [ Thu Apr 06, 2006 10:18 am ]
Post subject: 

Psst, Wayne...

sianblooz wrote:
Bean
Quote:
You're trying to make it sound as if Jim forced her to stand there and watch him hit the dying cat with a shovel.


Krist on a krutch, you people are incredible. This is a lie. If you want to prove I said this , go ahead. Be my guest. But you know its a lie.

Wijim said he did it in front of her. I did not make that up and its the only thing I've commented on. His own words.

Quit making up lies.


Actually, sianblooz...I don't see where Bean wrote that you said anything of the sort. What she did was make an assumption based on her knowledge of your position in regards to the accused. I tend to agree with her. This might seem a bit unfair to pre-judge a person in such cases, but it is not without some warrant here.

This reminds me of the last time our porn spammer was around, and how when he/she started posting insults and duplicate threads...Josh took the chance to ask when the porn was coming. He had strong reasoning to suspect such a thing might happen.

IOW, you just can't be trusted anymore, sianblooz. The past has shown that you lie and twist peoples words to paint a different picture than what actually happened.

What comes around...goes around.

Author:  wijim [ Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:00 am ]
Post subject: 

i did not know my daughter was watching. i assumed she didn't want to see because she chose to go into the house. i went in after it was dead and told her it was over. she said i know. and we hugged.

Author:  wijim [ Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:01 am ]
Post subject: 

sianblooz. do you feel guilty lying to your friend grace too?.....lol....






eta: im not saying grace considers sianblooz a friend fyi.

Author:  Amy7779311 [ Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:04 am ]
Post subject: 

I apologize. I had it wrong.

Author:  wijim [ Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:05 am ]
Post subject: 

sianblooz wrote:
Bean
Quote:
You're trying to make it sound as if Jim forced her to stand there and watch him hit the dying cat with a shovel.


Krist on a krutch, you people are incredible. This is a lie. If you want to prove I said this, go ahead. Be my guest. But you know its a lie.

Wijim said he did it in front of her. I did not make that up and its the only thing I've commented on. His own words.

Quit making up lies.



hmmm...a very common phrase another poster who lied alot on other boards used to use alot.

Author:  wijim [ Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:48 am ]
Post subject: 

sianblooz wrote:

LOL wijim you don't want to be "clear" about anything.

huge misrepresentation. i'd consider that to be another lie coming from barb aka sianblooz.

If you did, you would not have changed this story so many times.

huge misrepresentation. i'd consider that to be another lie coming from barb aka sianblooz.



Why don't you try reading what is written instead of what you want to think is written.


you gonna start being more honest if i reread?


If you read MY post, you'll see the words "In the context of your post". If you read Archer's post, you'll see the words "a person shouldn't keep a pet unless they can put that pet down themself if they need to."

big deal. what makes that meaningful in any way shape or form? then again what makes anything you have to spout meaningful in any way shape or form when you don't back up anything you say or answer to your misrepresentations and/or dishonesty??

Unless your daughter works for a living, she is not "keeping" a pet. YOU ARE.

explain your criteria. you make absolutely no sense. my house is as much my wife's and children's as it is mine.

Are you a child abuser?

I believe what you did is abusive. You'll have to ask RF if that means I said you are a child abuser.

avoiding the question is dishonest. but i dont expect honesty from you regardless as you have shown time and time again that you have an aversion to the concept. it's like you have a twisted need to lie...lol


I said I beleive a father who would beat his child's kitten to death in front of her is dog poo. Ask RF about that too.

i believe people who are too afraid to come out and state what they mean and hide behind loopholes of the rules are pieces of trash. that would make barb a stinking heap of trash, who is too afraid of saying exactly what she means.

This one single post is sure to become the basis for several more threads. Book mark it now.





[/i]
:wink: :roll:

Author:  wijim [ Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:51 am ]
Post subject: 

Amy7779311 wrote:
I apologize. I had it wrong.


no need to apologize. at least you look at things objectively. actually the fact that you apologized and stated you were wrong shows more integrity than one really needs.

you were just working on interpreting my unintentional lack of clarity.

Page 6 of 8 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/