EnviroLink Forum
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/

narrowing down the field.
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2484
Page 1 of 2

Author:  wijim [ Sun Apr 23, 2006 12:57 pm ]
Post subject:  narrowing down the field.

you see a person who is combative. and you think it seems familiar.

but being combative can be as an identifier limiting your search to a field of maybe a billion people.

then you add in common mispellings.....now those two items together, you have narrowed it down to a million for instance.

next you add a couple catch phrases, and you have narrowed it to maybe a few thousand.

still next you add in the odd idiosyncrasies of lack of logical cognition to the control subject coupled with the above examples and you are limiting it to a handfull of people (and im being very generous)....

finally you look at where the person originates geographically and add in a few more familiar old catch phrases.....and id say one could be pretty certain of the individual.

Author:  RF [ Sun Apr 23, 2006 1:07 pm ]
Post subject: 

Add in unsolicited PMs from people who apparently reached the same conclusion on their own. People who were much more intimately familiar with the person in question.

I ain't going to say that the conclusion is undeniable beyond a shadow of a doubt. I'm going to say that if the conclusion is incorrect, someone apparently has a long lost twin. :lol:

Author:  Donnie Mac Leod [ Sun Apr 23, 2006 1:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: narrowing down the field.

wijim wrote:
you see a person who is combative. and you think it seems familiar.

but being combative can be as an identifier limiting your search to a field of maybe a billion people.

then you add in common mispellings.....now those two items together, you have narrowed it down to a million for instance.

next you add a couple catch phrases, and you have narrowed it to maybe a few thousand.

still next you add in the odd idiosyncrasies of lack of logical cognition to the control subject coupled with the above examples and you are limiting it to a handfull of people (and im being very generous)....

finally you look at where the person originates geographically and add in a few more familiar old catch phrases.....and id say one could be pretty certain of the individual.



You forgot referring things on other boards that only someone on those boards and in debate over those points would know. Cat killing post would be an example.

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Sun Apr 23, 2006 1:49 pm ]
Post subject: 

Well, we have it straight from the "father, son, and holy ghost" of the internet ... who can argue with such logic especially with all of the statistical calculations .... it HAS to be "proof positive" just like some of those convictions you hear of every so often where the person has been found guilty and served time only to have the "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" found to have been wrong ..... :roll:

Author:  RF [ Sun Apr 23, 2006 1:52 pm ]
Post subject: 

Wayne Stollings wrote:
Well, we have it straight from the "father, son, and holy ghost" of the internet ... who can argue with such logic especially with all of the statistical calculations .... it HAS to be "proof positive" just like some of those convictions you hear of every so often where the person has been found guilty and served time only to have the "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" found to have been wrong ..... :roll:


You're misrepresenting my post. I think you do that because you aren't particularly honest.

Author:  SiberD [ Sun Apr 23, 2006 2:05 pm ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
just like some of those convictions you hear of every so often where the person has been found guilty and served time only to have the "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" found to have been wrong ..


'cept this ain't one of those cases. Sianblooz = barb and barb = Sianblooz.

Author:  josh knauer [ Sun Apr 23, 2006 2:40 pm ]
Post subject: 

SiberD wrote:
'cept this ain't one of those cases. Sianblooz = barb and barb = Sianblooz.

I am getting really sick of this... who cares? If she is or isn't the same person is up to her to reveal. In the meantime, why don't all of you just debate the issues, shoot the sh** in the open forum and let the chips fall where they may? When a person is so devious and evil (which I am not agreeing with, btw) then s/he will probably end up violating the rules around here in some serious ways.

In the meantime, she's making you guys look like paranoid idiots blathering on about something that happened on another board.

-josh

Author:  RF [ Sun Apr 23, 2006 7:29 pm ]
Post subject: 

josh knauer wrote:
SiberD wrote:
'cept this ain't one of those cases. Sianblooz = barb and barb = Sianblooz.

I am getting really sick of this... who cares? If she is or isn't the same person is up to her to reveal. In the meantime, why don't all of you just debate the issues, shoot the sh** in the open forum and let the chips fall where they may? When a person is so devious and evil (which I am not agreeing with, btw) then s/he will probably end up violating the rules around here in some serious ways.

In the meantime, she's making you guys look like paranoid idiots blathering on about something that happened on another board.

-josh


It's just entertainment Josh. I don't think anyone is paranoid so much as amused at the antics. If Sianblooz is Barb, she ain't evil. She's a long-running joke. And ya know...maybe that's why it is in the open forum, mostly.

Author:  sianblooz [ Sun Apr 23, 2006 8:21 pm ]
Post subject: 

:P Doesn't hurt me none so I'm cool with it. :P

Author:  SiberD [ Sun Apr 23, 2006 8:24 pm ]
Post subject: 

sianblooz wrote:
:P Doesn't hurt me none so I'm cool with it. :P


Well of course you are barb, you have no other choice :lol:

Author:  RF [ Sun Apr 23, 2006 8:38 pm ]
Post subject: 

And actually Josh? Much of the point is that "it" happened across several boards, for several years...and quite possibly your board here is just the latest in the list.

Author:  Grace [ Sun Apr 23, 2006 8:44 pm ]
Post subject: 

sianblooz wrote:
:P Doesn't hurt me none so I'm cool with it. :P



Well I'll tell ya, if it were me and I was not the person they believed I was, I'd be plenty pissed, not cool with it. But if I was the person they believed me to be, I'd be cool with it too. :wink:

Author:  SiberD [ Sun Apr 23, 2006 8:49 pm ]
Post subject: 

Grace wrote:
sianblooz wrote:
:P Doesn't hurt me none so I'm cool with it. :P



Well I'll tell ya, if it were me and I was not the person they believed I was, I'd be plenty pissed, not cool with it. But if I was the person they believed me to be, I'd be cool with it too. :wink:


ROTFL!! Yeah, like I said 8)

Author:  RF [ Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:02 pm ]
Post subject: 

Now, now....

If she is suspected of being the Fantasy Rehabber, but if in fact that isn't her identity...and if she knows very little of the distasteful character of that person...she might indeed be "cool" with it.

For instance, she might not understand that the old Hoghoser was completely opposed to wearing fur as ornament....but didn't particularly have anything against baking toads in a kiln as some sort of primitive pottery decoration.

Author:  RF [ Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:05 pm ]
Post subject: 

But given Sianblooz's ideas that killing animals to eat them is just unequivocably fine...she would certainly agree with Barb's Puppy Standard of Proper Animal Use that laid that out as general rule.

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/