EnviroLink Forum

Community • Ecology • Connection
It is currently Tue Jun 25, 2019 12:03 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2019 8:00 am 
Offline
EnviroLink Volunteer
EnviroLink Volunteer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:45 pm
Posts: 21357
Location: Southeastern US
tracy18 wrote:
Wayne Stollings wrote:
Iowanic wrote:
Well, it's that strictness that's the main point I'm driving at.

This appears to be gun-control that works....
Make the purchase of certain classes of firearms more vigorous.


Not to mention the cost factor. If the cost is too high the criminals have a harder time getting them to use because they are worth more to sell.



Veering slightly off what you're saying, do you think buy-back programs help at all? I've been reading contradicting reports about them, especially with their scope for misuse.

Here's one I recently read: https://www.foxnews.com/us/woman-turns-in-gun-at-baltimore-gun-buyback-progam-to-upgrade-to-better-weapon

Also, would you consider giving your guns up in a scheme like this?


Unless it was a gun in poor shape or cheaply made, the potential income from selling it to another individual would be greater than the amount received from most buy back programs.


I am not considering selling any of my guns, but would sell the high capacity magazines as part of a program to remove them from the market as part of a ban.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 11, 2019 10:55 am 
Offline
EnviroLink Volunteer
EnviroLink Volunteer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:45 pm
Posts: 21357
Location: Southeastern US
tracy18 wrote:
Also, would you consider giving your guns up in a scheme like this?


Unless it was a gun in poor shape or cheaply made, the potential income from selling it to another individual would be greater than the amount received from most buy back programs.


I am not considering selling any of my guns, but would sell the high capacity magazines as part of a program to remove them from the market as part of a ban.[/quote]

tracy18 wrote:
Why only the high capacity magazines? Any specific reason?


They cannot be used for hunting as the low capacity magazines can be and they allow a much great number of shots between reloading, which is where they become a critical factor in the mass shooting situations. It is removing the ability to fire 30+ shots before reloading during a period where the shooter is targeting innocent people with very little impact on gun ownership.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 11, 2019 1:37 pm 
Offline
Member with 50 posts!
Member with 50 posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 2:24 am
Posts: 94
In general, the public should have some assurance that firearms are registered and owners have sufficient training in using them.

Given the current trajectory of global issues, I think more will find the need to defend themselves.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 40 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group