EnviroLink Forum

Ethical dillema
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Gustavo Woltmann [ Thu Feb 18, 2016 2:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Ethical dillema

As an example, Peta supports and advocates the destruction of private property in a cause they believe to be just, that of animal rights.

If a person believed that animals did not have rights and took steps to prevent Peta from performing their operations by destroying their private property, Peta would have no choice but to accept these actions because it is what they condone.

If you supported the destruction of private property in an effort to achieve your goal and somebody reciprocated in kind because they disagreed with your goal; would you have an issue with those actions?

Author:  welshguest223 [ Tue Dec 13, 2016 4:40 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Ethical dillema

Well each situation is illegal so it doesn't matter.

Everyone has their own version of ethics.

Author:  Milton Banana [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 10:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Ethical dillema

I do not condone the destruction of private property. I do not believe animals have "rights." Humans are endowed with rights. Humans accord animals certain protections in the law which are not rights.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group