EnviroLink Forum
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/

why i am disapointed
http://www.envirolink.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2519
Page 1 of 4

Author:  wijim [ Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:38 pm ]
Post subject:  why i am disapointed

wayne i feel you have been so caught up in defense of sianblooz that you were left hung out to dry by her. she put forth some stuff, you picked a side and i feel you have misrepresented my position(s) for nothing more than defending something i find rather odd.....looks to me like you have been playing more semantics games than anyone you have accused of doing.

i dont care if you argue with me or debate....but man this "thats the way it is" crap is kinda old n transparent. you ask for support from others for their comments, but really offer nothing more (usually less) than what you expect.

im just statin how i see it. and really dont have alot more coment on it. i'll offer examples if you want...but you do realize that you won't accept them anyhow so i spared the length of this post in that case.

Author:  Wayne Stollings [ Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:27 pm ]
Post subject: 

Considering I have seen little of Sainblooz's posts to defend of late, it seems that the "reason" for your disappointment may not be what you believe it to be.

Author:  sianblooz [ Sat Apr 29, 2006 12:00 am ]
Post subject: 

http://www.ernestcline.com/dmd/

Author:  Donnie Mac Leod [ Sat Apr 29, 2006 9:53 am ]
Post subject: 

sianblooz wrote:



So you agree with the sumation or what Sianblooz?? Do you actually have that narrow a view of humanity or is it worse??

Author:  wijim [ Mon May 01, 2006 8:53 am ]
Post subject: 

Wayne Stollings wrote:
Considering I have seen little of Sainblooz's posts to defend of late, it seems that the "reason" for your disappointment may not be what you believe it to be.


who said anything about defending posts? eta:....its the continual defense i speak of as its not just singular posts i refer to. iow.....its your original defense of sianblooz i speak of and your past arguements with rf and donnie as well as myself which you seem to be on the defense and are grasping at anything and everything to thwart something i have yet to identify. so it seems like you are just continuing to pick a side against anything said..period...by rf, donnie and possibly myself if there are common agreements shared by any or all three of us.

hope thats more clear. :lol:

Author:  RF [ Mon May 01, 2006 12:16 pm ]
Post subject: 

wijim wrote:
Wayne Stollings wrote:
Considering I have seen little of Sainblooz's posts to defend of late, it seems that the "reason" for your disappointment may not be what you believe it to be.


who said anything about defending posts? eta:....its the continual defense i speak of as its not just singular posts i refer to. iow.....its your original defense of sianblooz i speak of and your past arguements with rf and donnie as well as myself which you seem to be on the defense and are grasping at anything and everything to thwart something i have yet to identify. so it seems like you are just continuing to pick a side against anything said..period...by rf, donnie and possibly myself if there are common agreements shared by any or all three of us.

hope thats more clear. :lol:


He's teaching us a lesson. :lol:

Author:  wijim [ Mon May 01, 2006 12:19 pm ]
Post subject: 

RF wrote:
wijim wrote:
Wayne Stollings wrote:
Considering I have seen little of Sainblooz's posts to defend of late, it seems that the "reason" for your disappointment may not be what you believe it to be.


who said anything about defending posts? eta:....its the continual defense i speak of as its not just singular posts i refer to. iow.....its your original defense of sianblooz i speak of and your past arguements with rf and donnie as well as myself which you seem to be on the defense and are grasping at anything and everything to thwart something i have yet to identify. so it seems like you are just continuing to pick a side against anything said..period...by rf, donnie and possibly myself if there are common agreements shared by any or all three of us.

hope thats more clear. :lol:


He's teaching us a lesson. :lol:


and what would that lesson be?....lol.

Author:  RF [ Mon May 01, 2006 12:39 pm ]
Post subject: 

wijim wrote:
RF wrote:
wijim wrote:
Wayne Stollings wrote:
Considering I have seen little of Sainblooz's posts to defend of late, it seems that the "reason" for your disappointment may not be what you believe it to be.


who said anything about defending posts? eta:....its the continual defense i speak of as its not just singular posts i refer to. iow.....its your original defense of sianblooz i speak of and your past arguements with rf and donnie as well as myself which you seem to be on the defense and are grasping at anything and everything to thwart something i have yet to identify. so it seems like you are just continuing to pick a side against anything said..period...by rf, donnie and possibly myself if there are common agreements shared by any or all three of us.

hope thats more clear. :lol:


He's teaching us a lesson. :lol:


and what would that lesson be?....lol.


It's a little complicated...and I ain't sure it had the effect he intended anyway.

Author:  Donnie Mac Leod [ Mon May 01, 2006 1:50 pm ]
Post subject: 

Wayne Stollings wrote:
Considering I have seen little of Sainblooz's posts to defend of late, it seems that the "reason" for your disappointment may not be what you believe it to be.



As if Sianblooz will stick with her claim about if you kill it you can eat it. I guarantee the old Sianblooz is going to be working double edged sword on that point. Sianblooz will find many opportunities to prove that animals shouldn't die to benefit men. Sianblooz will brand man monkey for using animals for many reasons. It will be Wayne that will be learning lessons that he never expected as Sianblooz could care less if Wayne becomes the scapegoat here.

Author:  Donnie Mac Leod [ Mon May 01, 2006 1:52 pm ]
Post subject: 

RF wrote:
wijim wrote:
RF wrote:
wijim wrote:
Wayne Stollings wrote:
Considering I have seen little of Sainblooz's posts to defend of late, it seems that the "reason" for your disappointment may not be what you believe it to be.


who said anything about defending posts? eta:....its the continual defense i speak of as its not just singular posts i refer to. iow.....its your original defense of sianblooz i speak of and your past arguements with rf and donnie as well as myself which you seem to be on the defense and are grasping at anything and everything to thwart something i have yet to identify. so it seems like you are just continuing to pick a side against anything said..period...by rf, donnie and possibly myself if there are common agreements shared by any or all three of us.

hope thats more clear. :lol:


He's teaching us a lesson. :lol:


and what would that lesson be?....lol.


It's a little complicated...and I ain't sure it had the effect he intended anyway.




However it did have the effect that Sianblooz wanted. Sianblooz would enjoy the conflict over trying to figure a method of pinning down the Puppy Standard ..

Author:  sianblooz [ Mon May 01, 2006 8:39 pm ]
Post subject: 

Donnie Mac Leod wrote:
RF wrote:
wijim wrote:
RF wrote:
wijim wrote:
Wayne Stollings wrote:
Considering I have seen little of Sainblooz's posts to defend of late, it seems that the "reason" for your disappointment may not be what you believe it to be.


who said anything about defending posts? eta:....its the continual defense i speak of as its not just singular posts i refer to. iow.....its your original defense of sianblooz i speak of and your past arguements with rf and donnie as well as myself which you seem to be on the defense and are grasping at anything and everything to thwart something i have yet to identify. so it seems like you are just continuing to pick a side against anything said..period...by rf, donnie and possibly myself if there are common agreements shared by any or all three of us.

hope thats more clear. :lol:


He's teaching us a lesson. :lol:


and what would that lesson be?....lol.


It's a little complicated...and I ain't sure it had the effect he intended anyway.




However it did have the effect that Sianblooz wanted. Sianblooz would enjoy the conflict over trying to figure a method of pinning down the Puppy Standard ..


Naugh. If I enjoyed the conflict, I would be waa-ing waa-ing to Wayne like you guys do.
:wink:

Author:  Donnie Mac Leod [ Tue May 02, 2006 6:08 am ]
Post subject: 

sianblooz wrote:
Donnie Mac Leod wrote:
RF wrote:
wijim wrote:
RF wrote:
wijim wrote:
Wayne Stollings wrote:
Considering I have seen little of Sainblooz's posts to defend of late, it seems that the "reason" for your disappointment may not be what you believe it to be.


who said anything about defending posts? eta:....its the continual defense i speak of as its not just singular posts i refer to. iow.....its your original defense of sianblooz i speak of and your past arguements with rf and donnie as well as myself which you seem to be on the defense and are grasping at anything and everything to thwart something i have yet to identify. so it seems like you are just continuing to pick a side against anything said..period...by rf, donnie and possibly myself if there are common agreements shared by any or all three of us.

hope thats more clear. :lol:


He's teaching us a lesson. :lol:


and what would that lesson be?....lol.


It's a little complicated...and I ain't sure it had the effect he intended anyway.




However it did have the effect that Sianblooz wanted. Sianblooz would enjoy the conflict over trying to figure a method of pinning down the Puppy Standard ..


Naugh. If I enjoyed the conflict, I would be waa-ing waa-ing to Wayne like you guys do.
:wink:




To Funny Sianblooz. You have a differrent method of playing Wayne for a Sucker. You appeal to his ego which you stoke so efficently.

Quote:
Donnie, I have done as Wayne requested, I have stopped calling names even though I'm afraid I could be suffering internal damage as a result.


Quote:
My apologies to the moderators for violating the rules of the board. I should not have let the (neverending) lies annoy me. I'll keep it clean in the future. Brings to mind that old saying about not getting down in the mud withh pigs...



Quote:
This is all real simple. Read my posts. Read Wayne's posts. If I now say I was referring to one or the other, half of you will say its not true. Doesn't matter what I more say, you'll lie if you want to. So no. I won't follow orders and I won't keep adding to this shit for the next 25 pages or so.




Quote:
I was going to say its worse than a tennis match. But its funnier. I'll give it that.

Score is Wayne - Match, Set and Game.

Note to Wayne - how would you feel about occasionally throwing a game so these fools could win once in a while?



Quote:
It does sound like she over reacted and my first reaction would be anger. I think Wayne is right though
.




Quote:
Krist on a krutch, you people are incredible
. Sianblooz is a leapord that can't change it's spots. Wayne has big juicy sucker written all over him. You been Whha Whaaing Wayne and it is quite humerous to see his reaction to your Superior brownie point system Sianblooz.

Author:  wijim [ Tue May 02, 2006 9:18 am ]
Post subject: 

lol.....thing i think is funny is that when you have a person with multiple personality disorder and dozens of handles.......none of them (the personas) are any smarter than any of the others (q,qwerty, bubbfs, barb, branmuffin, don coyote, galaxy clipper.........).

Author:  Donnie Mac Leod [ Tue May 02, 2006 2:00 pm ]
Post subject: 

wijim wrote:
lol.....thing i think is funny is that when you have a person with multiple personality disorder and dozens of handles.......none of them (the personas) are any smarter than any of the others (q,qwerty, bubbfs, barb, branmuffin, don coyote, galaxy clipper.........).




Actually I kinda like pointing out how easy it is to see through the rather transparent Sianblooz. :wink:

Author:  sianblooz [ Wed May 03, 2006 9:24 am ]
Post subject: 

You girls really should get some new material. :roll:

Page 1 of 4 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/