EnviroLink Forum

The Denver Post ran a picture on page 1 of a mother with child and husband looking on as their baby food was confiscated, another of an elderly man having to throw away his shaving cream. The ACLU is guilty of aiding, abetting, and encouraging illegals a separate felony for each illegal. Felons can not be attorneys. The PC garbage of not criminally profiling is insane and a burden on all non-terrorist/suicidal types. Moslems and anyone who looks like a moslem, a nervous, twitchy person, a shifty eyed person--they should not be allowed to fly. When you treat everyone like a criminal instead of just those most likely---the terrorists win. England let in those Pakistani moslems. Why a country so great, that fought in the Crusades, stood fast against Nazi bombing, would allow in obvious enemies, and destruction of a very old English culture is attributable only to those against the host country--actually traitors. The same here. Traitors from both parties, and international corporations. Too much PC human diversity ruins a country. Multi-culturalism sucks and so does globalism. We'll be ready for that Star Trek fantasy when we are more homogeneous as a species, not diverse. You are a sick liberal puke x. There were no sand chiggers flying Spitfires in the Battle of Britain. Mother England is infected with cancer and so is the US--but we will beat it. You are part of the cancer destroying a once great country.

_________________
"With every decision, think seven generations ahead of the consequences of your actions" Ute rule of life.
“We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children”
― Chief Seattle

Those Muslims were born in this country and are British citizens. You have some sick views.

Who was innocent? The ones in the "blunders"? When was their innocence known? After the fact? What were the curcumstances of the cases? You make many allegations but provide no information to support your final claims.



And your link confirms one and gives the possibility of another so you have yet to provide support for your claim yet again. Given the glaring mistake you made in the amount of time they could be held, you must understand why we doubt just your word on the subject.

Police arrested 24 people across England on Thursday, saying they had thwarted a plot to blow up as many as 10 passenger planes flying between Britain and the United States. One suspect was released without charge, and a court will decide Monday on the detention of another. The suspect cannot be questioned in the interim.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

You are an idiot. 5 have been released since the first arrests and in England you are innocent until proved guilty.

Seens such a short period to be arrested in such a serious case. What it boils down to is the police haven't got what they think and just grabbed for everyone who had a connection to these people. Panic arrests are not good enough.

If you insist on action like a div then do it on someone elses time.

You are an idiot. 5 have been released since the first arrests and in England you are innocent until proved guilty.

Seems such a short period to be arrested in such a serious case. What it boils down to is the police haven't got what they think and just grabbed for everyone who had a connection to these people. Panic arrests are not good enough.

If you insist on action like a div then do it on someone elses time.

Oh and if you read what I quoted hunter you will noticed we was also talking about the suspected chemical bombers who were shot then released

So that urging to undertake the attack before it was uncovered would not have caused the attack plan to be changed before the police knew of the time table? I would think that would be sufficient reason to act, but you have some unusual ideas on what the police should do to protect the public.



The mention was 7 times and he was the one running from the police if memory serves. If there is such information from an inquiry, it would be good to have referenced the report of that inquiry to support your claims. We still are only hearing your incorrect versions of events.



Including the BBC, correct? Did the British not give interviews to the BBC?



That matches my distrust of the information you relate without support given the number of significant errors in your statements.



You can make that determination with no more information than you have compared to the information they had? We call that "Monday morning quarterbacking" where you make retroactive decisions based on later information.



So you claim, but do not support said claim with anything of more substance than repetition, which does not make it any more truthful.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

This is becoming a bore.

Get a life you talk out of your backside far too much. Go find the inquiry yourself he wasn't running and he was shot 9 time and f##k me what two 9mm bullets when it's in your face?

I am an 'idiot' because you cannot provide support for your claims? The application of "innocent until proven guilty" does not apply to being arrested but only the court trial or there would be no arrests.

Which of the other 3 ARRESTED were released?

Why would the police not pick up everyone connected to the people known to be involved with the plot? They are contained until the probability of their innocence or guilt can be determined. If they release a member of the conspiracy they may have trouble arresting them again but if they get a relatively innocent person they can always release them. Do you propose all police have some type of psychic to determine who to arrest or what?

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

Since you link the BBC so much

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4159310.stm

So the BBC doen't know what it's talking about?



I have also seen articles that tend to back up what you've said, though sometimes facts like how many shots or other things are not consistent. So I tend to go with the BBC's story.

_________________
I don't know what your problem is but I bet its hard to pronounce.

Yes you are an idiot and in our country you are innocent until proved guilty.

If you want to make yourself look like a prick all the time and have me keep pulling links out for you then go find another toy to play with. It's common knowledge that 5 have been released since the beginning of this just because I don't link doesn't mean it hasn't happened.

It is becoming a bore and it is you who are becoming boring. From your link in the prior post. I cannot believe anything you say is truthful because of the number of errors you present as "fact" and even claim they are factual when your own references dispute your claim.

Unless you can provide some support of your claim concerning the inquiry I must assume it too is a fabrication of your wishful thinking.

http://feeds.thelondonnews.net/?rid=1e0 ... 33ee08&f=1

Police Commissioner Ian Blair has come under heavy criticism because of this and other missteps since four suicide bombers in London's transit system killed 52 people in July. Shortly after those bombs went off, the police mistook a Brazilian electrician, Jean Charles de Menezes, 27, for a terrorist on the subway and shot him seven times in the head.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

Your latest BBC link looks almost like a compromise between their earlier article and some of the other articles I've read. I have a feeling the truth is probably somewhere in the middle too, but then isn't this whole issue in part what terrorists want. Striking fear in innocent people.

_________________
I don't know what your problem is but I bet its hard to pronounce.

In the courts, not in the police station.



Just as it is common knowledge there were 9 shots instead of 7 and the prisoners could be held for 3 months instead the 28 days ....

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

The number of shots fired were 9, it's how many of them hit him that's confused when reporting. I will post the final report when I can be bothered.

At the end of the day he shouldn't have been shot. It was bundled by the special forces from the begining.

What we have here is SAS trigger happy freaks shooting people because they are not held accountable.