EnviroLink Forum

Community • Ecology • Connection
It is currently Sat Oct 25, 2014 8:21 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Clinton vs Wallace
PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 3:58 pm 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 2:02 pm
Posts: 2314
anyone watch the tongue-lashing Clinton gave Chris Wallace yesterday
on Fox News...man I'd never want to get into a verbal spar that man...
he chewed up Wallace and spit him out...poor guy was half stammering
and stumbling all over his words.

go getem' Bill!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060925/ap_ ... n_fox_news

_________________
join the Ron Paul Revolution!
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

if I could wake up tomorrow morning and push a button and all the AR's would be gone, I would lay awake tonight in anticipation of pushing the button.~~OHIOSTEVE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clinton vs Wallace
PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:08 pm 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 9:34 am
Posts: 6321
Location: Texas
denni50 wrote:
anyone watch the tongue-lashing Clinton gave Chris Wallace yesterday
on Fox News...man I'd never want to get into a verbal spar that man...
he chewed up Wallace and spit him out...poor guy was half stammering
and stumbling all over his words.

go getem' Bill!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060925/ap_ ... n_fox_news


:lol: He hardly chewed him up and spit him out. More lies just like any typical politician.

_________________
"Yes like I said it all boils down to morals. What you think is right doesn't make a person wrong because they think different ;)" X-Black


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:32 pm 
Offline
Member with 200 posts
Member with 200 posts
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 12:24 am
Posts: 423
Location: Austin, TX
I thought the best part was when Clinton commented on Wallace's smirk. He DOES smirk, all the time. It's like he holds his mouth in a continuous smirk.

I'm inclined to believe Clinton on this one, although he used kind of the same tone in denying a sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky (which, btw, was no one's damn business, and how rude to ask!).

I'm inclined to believe it. I think in the final outcome, history will judge Clinton with much more respect than America does now - largely because of loud mouth losers like Limbaugh. It's amazing to me how hurt and wounded the conservative voice is now with the disrespectful treatment Bush is getting (which isn't right either, he deserves the respect owed to a President) but they don't remember giving worse to Clinton.

If we could just carry on as a country without louts like Limbaugh, and Bortz, and Sean Hannity, we'd be a much better place. And if Chris Wallace would wipe that smirk off his face.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 8:42 am 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 2:02 pm
Posts: 2314
Bush has been the best thing for the liberal left...they couldn't have gotten
a better "weapon" to squelch the conservative fanaticism that was sweeping the country 6 years ago.

Democrats are going to sweep the upcoming elections and take back
the Congress.

Wallace is still trying to piece himself back together after the "shredding"

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

sick'em Bill!!

_________________
join the Ron Paul Revolution!
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

if I could wake up tomorrow morning and push a button and all the AR's would be gone, I would lay awake tonight in anticipation of pushing the button.~~OHIOSTEVE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:29 am 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 9:34 am
Posts: 6321
Location: Texas
LC wrote:
I'm inclined to believe Clinton on this one, although he used kind of the same tone in denying a sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky (which, btw, was no one's damn business, and how rude to ask!).


Wow, you don't think the character of our President is important? :shock:

_________________
"Yes like I said it all boils down to morals. What you think is right doesn't make a person wrong because they think different ;)" X-Black


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:52 am 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 2:02 pm
Posts: 2314
Quote:
Wow, you don't think the character of our President is important?


yeah like the lying sob who took us to war in Iraq and sacrificed the lives of 2,970 Americans for nothing(oh wait...I forgot...it was 9/11).

_________________
join the Ron Paul Revolution!
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

if I could wake up tomorrow morning and push a button and all the AR's would be gone, I would lay awake tonight in anticipation of pushing the button.~~OHIOSTEVE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 11:23 am 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 9:34 am
Posts: 6321
Location: Texas
denni50 wrote:
Quote:
Wow, you don't think the character of our President is important?


yeah like the lying sob who took us to war in Iraq and sacrificed the lives of 2,970 Americans for nothing(oh wait...I forgot...it was 9/11).


So you think the character of our President is important. Good.

_________________
"Yes like I said it all boils down to morals. What you think is right doesn't make a person wrong because they think different ;)" X-Black


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 11:35 am 
Offline
Member with 500 Posts!
Member with 500 Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:26 pm
Posts: 500
Archer wrote:
LC wrote:
I'm inclined to believe Clinton on this one, although he used kind of the same tone in denying a sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky (which, btw, was no one's damn business, and how rude to ask!).


Wow, you don't think the character of our President is important? :shock:


Sure its important.
Thats why we need a new president.

_________________
"The rule is perfect: in all matters of opinion our adversaries are insane." Mark Twain


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 11:49 am 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 2:02 pm
Posts: 2314
Quote:
Sure its important.
Thats why we need a new president.


=D> =D>

_________________
join the Ron Paul Revolution!
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

if I could wake up tomorrow morning and push a button and all the AR's would be gone, I would lay awake tonight in anticipation of pushing the button.~~OHIOSTEVE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:10 pm 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 3:45 pm
Posts: 10701
Location: S. Fla
I read something interesting the other day about Bush and the "sunk costs" fallacy he continually employs with the Iraqi war. The sunk costs fallacy is the old adage of throwing good money after bad (like spending $1000 on repairs for your old car, but it breaks down again and requires another $1000 to keep it running - do you invest more because of what you've already invested or decide it's time to stop throwing away good money after bad?). This fallacy is defined as continuing an unrewarding activity because of "what you've already invested in it". You can't reclaim that money, the time and money is gone. Bush repeatedly uses that fallacy with the war "for staying the course." How many times has he said he's not going to sacrifice the lives of 2500+ troops who've died and sacrificed their lives by pulling out before the job is done? We shouldn't keep sacrificing lives simply because we owe it to those who've already been killed. It's the same as throwing good money after bad and it's fallacious.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:58 pm 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 9:34 am
Posts: 6321
Location: Texas
sianblooz wrote:
Archer wrote:
LC wrote:
I'm inclined to believe Clinton on this one, although he used kind of the same tone in denying a sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky (which, btw, was no one's damn business, and how rude to ask!).


Wow, you don't think the character of our President is important? :shock:


Sure its important.
Thats why we need a new president.


Why must everyone throw things off track with jabs at Bush? We all know everyone hates him, so can we stay on topic?

_________________
"Yes like I said it all boils down to morals. What you think is right doesn't make a person wrong because they think different ;)" X-Black


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 2:55 pm 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 3:45 pm
Posts: 10701
Location: S. Fla
Archer wrote:
sianblooz wrote:
Archer wrote:
LC wrote:
I'm inclined to believe Clinton on this one, although he used kind of the same tone in denying a sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky (which, btw, was no one's damn business, and how rude to ask!).


Wow, you don't think the character of our President is important? :shock:


Sure its important.
Thats why we need a new president.


Why must everyone throw things off track with jabs at Bush? We all know everyone hates him, so can we stay on topic?


Well I didn't see the show so I guess I have nothing to say about Clinton vs. Wallace. But I did watch Nancy Grace.. :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:16 pm 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 2:02 pm
Posts: 2314
Quote:
Why must everyone throw things off track with jabs at Bush? We all know everyone hates him, so can we stay on topic?


Archer it was you who brought up the issue of importance in character with regards to Clinton being a 'womanizer'...was it poor judgement...sure no one disagrees with that...but at least this character flaw didn't cost any lives..maybe a tiff in his marriage.

_________________
join the Ron Paul Revolution!
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

if I could wake up tomorrow morning and push a button and all the AR's would be gone, I would lay awake tonight in anticipation of pushing the button.~~OHIOSTEVE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:36 pm 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 9:34 am
Posts: 6321
Location: Texas
denni50 wrote:
Quote:
Why must everyone throw things off track with jabs at Bush? We all know everyone hates him, so can we stay on topic?


Archer it was you who brought up the issue of importance in character with regards to Clinton being a 'womanizer'...was it poor judgement...sure no one disagrees with that...but at least this character flaw didn't cost any lives..maybe a tiff in his marriage.


But Clinton was the subject, not Bush.

Anyway, it revealed his character. Once again, you're trying to derail things with comparing him to Bush. Leave that be.

_________________
"Yes like I said it all boils down to morals. What you think is right doesn't make a person wrong because they think different ;)" X-Black


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:44 pm 
Offline
Member with 500 Posts!
Member with 500 Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:26 pm
Posts: 500
Archer wrote:
sianblooz wrote:
Archer wrote:
LC wrote:
I'm inclined to believe Clinton on this one, although he used kind of the same tone in denying a sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky (which, btw, was no one's damn business, and how rude to ask!).


Wow, you don't think the character of our President is important? :shock:


Sure its important.
Thats why we need a new president.


Why must everyone throw things off track with jabs at Bush? We all know everyone hates him, so can we stay on topic?


Why did you ask the question then?

We're supposedly the richest country in the world. Why can't we have a president who can read and think and talk?

_________________
"The rule is perfect: in all matters of opinion our adversaries are insane." Mark Twain


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group