EnviroLink Forum

Community • Ecology • Connection
It is currently Tue Jun 18, 2013 3:03 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 177 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:55 am 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 5:17 am
Posts: 9568
Shhhhh!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:56 am 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:49 pm
Posts: 7554
Location: England
Iowanic wrote:
Ok......

I better warn all.....I'm in a mischief mood. I suspect I'll be disagreeing about everything, just to do so. :twisted:

Sorry ahead of time.


*******************
OMG, Iowanic is morphing into another Wayne...
Run for the hills folks.

(Sorry Wayne) .

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:57 am 
Offline
EnviroLink Volunteer
EnviroLink Volunteer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:45 pm
Posts: 20134
Location: Southeastern US
Wayne Stollings wrote:
Xothermic wrote:
Quote:
"If you were aboard a lifeboat with a baby and a dog, and the boat capsized, would you rescue the baby or the dog?"


Question - Why not break the rules and try to save both?


That is what Kirk did in his Starfleet Acadamy exercise, but that involved changing the program. It is hard to change the program in life unless you have supernatural powers and then why not just prevent the need for the lifeboat?



animallover wrote:

I am with Xo.....I said it a long time ago in another thread......I would try to save both. In real life you always have choices.


Yes, but in reality the choices are limited by what will succeed. That choice might actually result in all three being lost instead of saving two.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:58 am 
Offline
EnviroLink Volunteer
EnviroLink Volunteer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:45 pm
Posts: 20134
Location: Southeastern US
jhawk wrote:
Iowanic wrote:
Ok......

I better warn all.....I'm in a mischief mood. I suspect I'll be disagreeing about everything, just to do so. :twisted:

Sorry ahead of time.


*******************
OMG, Iowanic is morphing into another Wayne...
Run for the hills folks.

(Sorry Wayne) .

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted:


He has just come over to the dark side for the cookies is all ..... they are chocolate chip with nuts today.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:58 am 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:38 am
Posts: 16150
Location: Florida
It's the Gnomes. He tried to convince us he was all better....but I didn't buy it. I knew when he said he was eating neosporin.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:00 am 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 5:17 am
Posts: 9568
Hey, antibioics is almost a new food-group.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:03 am 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:38 am
Posts: 16150
Location: Florida
Wayne Stollings wrote:

Yes, but in reality the choices are limited by what will succeed. That choice might actually result in all three being lost instead of saving two.


People make sacrifices everyday......and the choice to do so always exists. To think otherwise makes for a very limited outlook. I would rather try than not but that is me.....and I hope if I needed help that I wasn't stuck with someone unwilling to try whatever they could because they could only think about themselves or by what they "think" will suceed.
The only true failure is in not making the attempt or trying.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:04 am 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:49 pm
Posts: 7554
Location: England
My police training said that the first rule is to assess the situation and then don't make ourselves into another casualty.

In spite of that my instincts always were...and still are...to put others' lives before my own.
That's the way I am.

Of course the test would be in a real event. I don't know if I could run into a burning building, or attempt a sea-rescue.

I hope I never have to find out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:07 am 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:49 pm
Posts: 7554
Location: England
OMG, Iowanic is morphing into another Wayne...
Run for the hills folks.

(Sorry Wayne) .

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted:[/quote]

He has just come over to the dark side for the cookies is all ..... they are chocolate chip with nuts today.[/quote]

***************
Ooooh, I'll be right over...swap some of your cookies for some of my Weightwatchers' ginger and lemon ones ? They're quite good actually.

=P~


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:08 am 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:38 am
Posts: 16150
Location: Florida
I have found out that that intinct overrides any fear.....that is until after and you are trying to figure out what you just did. :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:12 am 
Offline
EnviroLink Volunteer
EnviroLink Volunteer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:45 pm
Posts: 20134
Location: Southeastern US
jhawk wrote:
Quote:

He has just come over to the dark side for the cookies is all ..... they are chocolate chip with nuts today.


***************
Ooooh, I'll be right over...swap some of your cookies for some of my Weightwatchers' ginger and lemon ones ? They're quite good actually.

=P~


Sorry, but the Dark side prohibits cookies form Weightwatchers .... or any that could be called "good" for you.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 am 
Offline
EnviroLink Volunteer
EnviroLink Volunteer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:45 pm
Posts: 20134
Location: Southeastern US
Choice A: Person lives

Choice B: Person and infant lives

Choice C: Person and dog lives

Choice D: None live.

The crux of the question has always been between B and C as no rational person should choose either A or D in this case.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:17 am 
Offline
EnviroLink Volunteer
EnviroLink Volunteer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:45 pm
Posts: 20134
Location: Southeastern US
animallover wrote:
Wayne Stollings wrote:

Yes, but in reality the choices are limited by what will succeed. That choice might actually result in all three being lost instead of saving two.


People make sacrifices everyday......and the choice to do so always exists. To think otherwise makes for a very limited outlook. I would rather try than not but that is me.....and I hope if I needed help that I wasn't stuck with someone unwilling to try whatever they could because they could only think about themselves or by what they "think" will suceed.


Sure, but in the context of this question the sacrifice is, the dog, the infant, both the dog and infant, or the dog, the infant, and the person that is supposed to decide. It seems the last two are not the better choices to me, but they are valid choices.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:22 am 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:38 am
Posts: 16150
Location: Florida
Wayne Stollings wrote:
Choice A: Person lives

Choice B: Person and infant lives

Choice C: Person and dog lives

Choice D: None live.

The crux of the question has always been between B and C as no rational person should choose either A or D in this case.


You cannot say what the outcome will be for sure....you can speculate what it might be. But then again you refuse to see that the boat is still usable.....it is NOT sunk. But that is the difference in how people look at things. You have missed the forest for the trees. The option of using the boat was always there and could always be used.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:25 am 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:38 am
Posts: 16150
Location: Florida
Wayne Stollings wrote:
animallover wrote:
Wayne Stollings wrote:

Yes, but in reality the choices are limited by what will succeed. That choice might actually result in all three being lost instead of saving two.


People make sacrifices everyday......and the choice to do so always exists. To think otherwise makes for a very limited outlook. I would rather try than not but that is me.....and I hope if I needed help that I wasn't stuck with someone unwilling to try whatever they could because they could only think about themselves or by what they "think" will suceed.


Sure, but in the context of this question the sacrifice is, the dog, the infant, both the dog and infant, or the dog, the infant, and the person that is supposed to decide. It seems the last two are not the better choices to me, but they are valid choices.


The context of the question was to try to put the value of one over the other and nothing else. No need to over analyse what it really is.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 177 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group