EnviroLink Forum

Community • Ecology • Connection
It is currently Fri Oct 24, 2014 9:34 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:18 pm 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:38 am
Posts: 16150
Location: Florida
jhawk wrote:
animallover wrote:
Because all games aside, as I am not really into games to begin with, she is who has been referred to throughout, indirectly, as has been your intent in protecting her position the past few days. Which is fine and I understand that. Second she is the only one that has "chosen" to to quit posting herself and instead has taken a sideline position.


Ok AL, just to put the record straight, I'll defend ANYONE who I think is being singled out for unfairness. That is my way.
From the sidelines, you get a good idea of what is going on in a ' game ' , more than the players.
If people don't like me defending (not protecting) anyone then tough !

So let's move on .


Assuptions are a funny thing. You are assuming that she was singled out and you would be wrong in that assumption. The difference being everyone else read their PM and complied without drama. You have no idea what was said and whom it was said to. The problem with a sideline position is you only get one view. You can defend anyone you wish but it would be wise only to do so if you are sure of the facts involved first and not based on assumptions. :wink:
And moving on is a wise suggestion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:34 pm 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:49 pm
Posts: 7554
Location: England
animallover wrote:
jhawk wrote:
animallover wrote:
Because all games aside, as I am not really into games to begin with, she is who has been referred to throughout, indirectly, as has been your intent in protecting her position the past few days. Which is fine and I understand that. Second she is the only one that has "chosen" to to quit posting herself and instead has taken a sideline position.


Ok AL, just to put the record straight, I'll defend ANYONE who I think is being singled out for unfairness. That is my way.
From the sidelines, you get a good idea of what is going on in a ' game ' , more than the players.
If people don't like me defending (not protecting) anyone then tough !

So let's move on .


Assuptions are a funny thing. You are assuming that she was singled out and you would be wrong in that assumption. The difference being everyone else read their PM and complied without drama. You have no idea what was said and whom it was said to. The problem with a sideline position is you only get one view. You can defend anyone you wish but it would be wise only to do so if you are sure of the facts involved first and not based on assumptions. :wink:
And moving on is a wise suggestion.


********************
And moving on is a wise suggestion.[/color][/quote]

So do it for goodness sake !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 7:47 pm 
Offline
EnviroLink Volunteer
EnviroLink Volunteer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:45 pm
Posts: 20562
Location: Southeastern US
animallover wrote:
jhawk wrote:
animallover wrote:
Because all games aside, as I am not really into games to begin with, she is who has been referred to throughout, indirectly, as has been your intent in protecting her position the past few days. Which is fine and I understand that. Second she is the only one that has "chosen" to to quit posting herself and instead has taken a sideline position.


Ok AL, just to put the record straight, I'll defend ANYONE who I think is being singled out for unfairness. That is my way.
From the sidelines, you get a good idea of what is going on in a ' game ' , more than the players.
If people don't like me defending (not protecting) anyone then tough !

So let's move on .


Assuptions are a funny thing. You are assuming that she was singled out and you would be wrong in that assumption. The difference being everyone else read their PM and complied without drama. You have no idea what was said and whom it was said to. The problem with a sideline position is you only get one view. You can defend anyone you wish but it would be wise only to do so if you are sure of the facts involved first and not based on assumptions. :wink:
And moving on is a wise suggestion.



jhawk wrote:

********************
And moving on is a wise suggestion.[/color]


So do it for goodness sake ![/quote]

Lets do just that, I think everyone has had a chance to understand the situation So there should be no need to bring it up again, right? I think any further mentions of the prior violations of the current rules would be subject to an official warning after this point.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:20 pm 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!

Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:49 pm
Posts: 7554
Location: England
Ok AL, just to put the record straight, I'll defend ANYONE who I think is being singled out for unfairness. That is my way.
From the sidelines, you get a good idea of what is going on in a ' game ' , more than the players.
If people don't like me defending (not protecting) anyone then tough !

So let's move on .[/quote]

Assuptions are a funny thing. You are assuming that she was singled out and you would be wrong in that assumption. The difference being everyone else read their PM and complied without drama. You have no idea what was said and whom it was said to. The problem with a sideline position is you only get one view. You can defend anyone you wish but it would be wise only to do so if you are sure of the facts involved first and not based on assumptions. :wink:
And moving on is a wise suggestion.
[/quote]


jhawk wrote:

********************
And moving on is a wise suggestion.[/color]


So do it for goodness sake ![/quote]

Lets do just that, I think everyone has had a chance to understand the situation So there should be no need to bring it up again, right? I think any further mentions of the prior violations of the current rules would be subject to an official warning after this point.[/quote]

**************************
Thanks Wayne. Hopefully this means PMs too.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group