jhawk wrote:
ranka wrote:
animallover wrote:
Admin Note: Complaints about censorship have been moved to the Feedback Forum
This is censorship for highlighting censorship. You are a disgrace to the art of moderating.
Ranka
********************
There there, never mind....' Uncle ' Wayne will be back soon then you can all go crying to him.
ranka wrote:
Well, I don't remember crying to anyone on this freaky forum. However, at least Wayne knows what a logical argument is. He will be most amused to see how people failed to understand Dr. Yates' imput about Regan's NONsupport for violence.
Ranka.
1. Why was this dragged into Feedback section, beats me. I'm sure that Josh has more important things to do than to read about these silly personal vendettas and venom causing some people to lose control and continue censoring and moving my posts and threads around, who knows how many times so far.
2. Actually, when you stop and think, Dr. Yates input about Regan's NONsupport for violence was not directly related to the original topic which was about Dr. Steven Best's article. On the other hand, juxtaposition of my four photos was directly addressing AR "terrorism" vs state-military-industrial terrorism which was the essence of Dr. Steven Best's article and his ideology. The full four page article
Agent Wayne Pacelle, the Hypocricy Society of the United States, and the Thrill Kill Cult can be found on
AnimalConcerns.org home page under the
New Links. The discussion should have been centered around and about how "while HSUS sucks up activists, other organizations, and barrels of cash, it actively collaborates with —
sorry Lee Hall, not to offend your pious Buddhist-pacifist sympathies, but I have no problem with the word – our enemies: to be precise, our sworn implacable enemies in the animal exploitation industry with whom we are engaged in a serious battle because they have waged war against animals." This is the quote from that long article by Steven Best which was the heading of that thread. It does not take a rocket scientist to see that juxtaposition of the four photos in question in my post had visually more to do with the topic of that article than anything else discussed on that thread so far.
I am sure Wayne would have been able to understand this. Is Wayne coming back? I hope so! However, I could be wrong, but my feeling is that he's not. In the light of everything else, this would not be surprising.