Except, unless you perhaps go off and become a hermit completely without any kind of technology, and eat only wild fruits, nuts, etc., it is impossible to live "doing no harm to a beast". It is nothing more than a spiritual/moral self-delusion and a platitude. Reality is a stubborn thing.[/quote]
The hermit could very well step on insects in his search for nuts and fruit. He would also be breathing in microorganisms from the air.
Which of the 6.5 billion realities were you referring to?[/quote]
Quote:
The hermit could very well step on insects in his search for nuts and fruit. He would also be breathing in microorganisms from the air.
Very true indeed. So why the need for deluded spiritual platitudes like "harm no beast"? Why the need for pretentious, hypocritical dogmas like veganism? To simply make people feel good about themselves?[/quote]
Dogma can come of anything at all if one simply becomes dogmatic about it. Veganism in itself isn't necessarily dogmatic. Likewise people espousing a dogmatic version of veganism may be pretentious and hypocritical, but I don't find veganism to be so in and of itself. Veganism is simply the placing of boundaries around food and in this case, abstenism from meat and dairy. There's no pretense or hypocrisy in that simple food boundary anymore than in the Jewish cultures encouragement of eating only foods that are kosher. There is reason and logic in the history of kosher foods as there is in veganism. I think most people choose vegetarian and/or vegan diets because they feel it is a good thing to do - it makes sense to them, so they do it. Kind of like throwing a pop can in the garbage vs. the recycling box. Why would anyone choose the recycling box, especially as it may not be as quick and convenient? Probably because they think it is reasonable to do so.
"Harm no beast" is a bit too broad of a stroke, but to answer your question and in keeping with knight's invitation for this thread, I offer Mahatma Ghandi's "Live simply so that others may simply live."