EnviroLink Forum

_________________
I use red, not because of anger but to define my posts to catch rebuttals latter and it makes the quote feature redundent for me. The rest of you pick your own color.

Life is a time capsule we strive to fill with precious memories.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

_________________
I use red, not because of anger but to define my posts to catch rebuttals latter and it makes the quote feature redundent for me. The rest of you pick your own color.

Life is a time capsule we strive to fill with precious memories.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

_________________
I use red, not because of anger but to define my posts to catch rebuttals latter and it makes the quote feature redundent for me. The rest of you pick your own color.

Life is a time capsule we strive to fill with precious memories.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

Can morality exist in an objective state and not just a subjective one. If it can then what percentage can be fixed ( in the objective state) and at what percentage can be attributed to the discretion of the sentient evaluating the morals of a given situation in a subjective state?
I would suggest the percentages would be variable according to the given situation or circumstance albeit seemingly obvious!!! Could they overlap and corrupt the percentage rule in this particular case?

Referring to the subjective state how individual would the moral assessment be? In that I mean would they be a collective result as Nietzsche wrote in the Gay Science that morality is a herd instinct in the individual?

Would a world without humans be an amoral one or would the 'lesser sentients' keep the moral and immoral concepts alive even though the present attitude is one that morals are a human behaviour or characteristic?

There is no objective moral code because only humans have created morals for use in their civilizations to our knowledge. If morals were created in nature there would be an objective basis, but that is not the case. Thus, each civilization and culture within the civilizations create their own moral code to use for themselves.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

_________________
TANG SOO!

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein