Wayne Stollings wrote:
(ignorant because the persons did not know about diseases in the blood and organs like Hep C and cancers)
then you have the 1989 book author still trying to sell it. Spam, and 3 more than mothy who make numerous inane comments, and I thought one was bad enough!!
Did you not know that donated organs are screened for infection etc..? Who's the ignorant one on this I ask myself..
The lack of knowledge of disease in the blood and organs would make one ignorant of that fact and knowing there could be some screening does not eliminate the risk or the lack of knowledge of the possible diseease vector.
No it shows that the risks are low enough for donated organ donation to be practised world wide and it saves lives.
Which has nothing at all to do with your statement concerning ignorance and screening.
I didn't claim there was no risk.
No, I just was being complete in my statement.
Very negative posting coming from the regulars, if you don't want me here just say so and I will vacate this place without a problem. I don't think it would help matters if people are allowed to insult others, is this how things work around here.
Wait, you tossed a couple of insults at me and now you have a problem with it?
I've been called a fruit cake twice on this forum and would expect a moderator to take action, it offend me.
Does that mean a moderator should take action for your insults or is it just a double standard?
I wonder if Mr electric boogaloo would refuse a donated organ...
It might depend on the donor or the circumstances ... or not.