Wayne Stollings wrote:
tommee wrote:
Wayne Stollings wrote:
Says what? That vivisection was not mentioned at all? That medical research is not vivisection? What?
It says that Altzimer's disease is research using animals, ie: vivisection same for medical research.
Stop with the idiotic rants.
So you did not mean to say what it seems you were saying?
tommee wrote:
Oh dear what an idiot you really are, typical yank. You think you can spin posts around but I just can't be bothered if you are incapable of following a topic.
It seems you are too confused to understand what is going on. You brought up the subject of vivisection out of some attempt to deflect the discussion and then tried to dodge when called on it by the nonsensical post that sounded as if you were connecting the two.
Quote:
I can certainly produce links that support Altzimer's uses vivisection as part of their studies, same for medical research.
That is all well and good but neither ONLY uses vivisection so the connection is nothing to anyone but yourself in you confused state.
Quote:
The ban takes in a whole range of research, all the same vivisection is part and parcel of the ban. If you are too stupid to understand this then there is no hope for you.
I am not so stupid as to be fooled by your poor attempts at defelction. You brought up vivisection, no other poster mentioned it. There was never a question that the ban prevented the use of vivisection in higher primates in the UK except in your addled replies.
Quote:
So stop with this pathetic line of enquiry.
When you stop making pathetic attempts to mislead it will not be necessary to refute them and we all will be happier, I am sure.