Milton Banana wrote:
Well, we certainly know now where you are getting your information from.
Then why didn't you reference it?
A completely leftist outlet known for lying about a great many things. Defiantly not a reputable information source who attempted to tell a man he does not have a daughter that he clearly has.
No, that is a compound logical fallacy. The daughter he has, according to his email, was at another school that day, but why let facts get in the way of a good misrepresentation.
Why would someone go before a state government and lie about something that is clearly verifiable?
He did not, you did. He said she was in lock down, while you and others claim she was in Sandy Hook.
If he did everyone other than Slate would be trumpeting that fact.
You mean like the original source?
And, you come forth and claim he is not honest without verifiable links or information?
No, YOU are not honest about verifiable links or information.
Excuse me but your shoveling shit here.
I am only trying to shovel that you dumped back out of the way so the truth can be known.
This man comes off as completely honest and for that he is lied about for an agenda.
So you lied about him for an agenda?
A laughable internet site that has demonstrated a complete bias to leftist causes.
Really? Which site do you reference? The one to which you linked or the one posting his email to them about the truth of the matter?
Completely pathetic counter argument really.
Wrong, but you are on a roll. Too bad you did not claim it was a testimony in Congress as some have done. That would have added to the misrepresentation level.
Beneath you in all respects.
What you did, is beneath me and I would never have done it.
Once again confirming my observation you are nothing but a dogmatic intractable drone. Incapable of reasonable thought.
At least I have not been caught in a lie and then tried to defend it by slinging mud. You have no credibility what so ever at this point and that reflects on the position you support as well.
The original source: (even mentioned in the link you provided if you had bothered to read it)http://www.examiner.com/article/sandy-h ... un-controlUPDATE: I was contacted last night by Mr. Stevens with the following correction:
Thank you for the nice article about my testimony in Hartford. Unlike the Liberal media who don't let facts get in the way, I just wanted to let you know that my daughter does not attend Sandy Hook Elementary, but was in "lock down" nonetheless on December 14, 2012 at Reed Intermediate School (5th & 6th grade) about a mile away with her classmates, one of whom lost his little sister that day.
Do you really think a "completely leftist outlet known for lying about a great many things" would present a "nice article about <Stevens> testimony in Hartford" or that Stevens would bother to contact them if they had?
Two words ..... EPIC FAIL