EnviroLink Forum

Community • Ecology • Connection
It is currently Sun Oct 26, 2014 2:05 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:08 am 
Offline
Member with 50 posts!
Member with 50 posts!

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 5:33 am
Posts: 67
Deb

Further to the above I grew up on the west coast of coast of Ireland where the winds typically blew from the west. The sky when it was not raining was a brilliant blue, except on the rare occasions when the wind blew from the east and then we got all the industrial smoke and muck from the UK and Europe which resulted in the air gradually getting worse and worse, that was nearly 50 years ago. On the last occasion when I went over too Europe I noticed a continuous haze of pollution that most people seemed to regard as normal.

This site will allow you to track the pollution in your area.
http://www.airnow.gov/index.cfm?action=airnow.local_state&stateid=10&tab=1

If you think that your area is bad spare a thought for the people who live in Beijing where the the level of pollution is so bad at times that is off the scale of the equipment to measure.
Image
From left to right, air pollution over Tiananmen Square on March 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14 and 15, 2013

It is also worth pointing out that the atmosphere is typically divided up into the boundary layer which is where most of the weather occurs and higher layers. The boundary layer is typically turbulent and provides good mixing of the atmosphere. Above this layer the air is typically stable and vertical mixing is very slow. Con trails normally occur well into the stratosphere (a stable layer) where anything sprayed of small droplet size would take days, and possible weeks to reach the surface. Next time you see a shaft of light notice how slowly the dust descends, and bear in mind that the size of droplets sprayed from a jet aircraft would have to be much smaller just to achieve any appreciable amount of coverage.

_________________
Pollution is not the solution


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 7:11 am 
Offline
EnviroLink Volunteer
EnviroLink Volunteer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:45 pm
Posts: 20562
Location: Southeastern US
Are you sure there is an increase or are you now noticing more which causes you to think there is an increase? That is the problem with leaping to a conclusion especially one based on internet blogs by random people. The chemistry, the math, and even the physics do not support the chemtrail theory these folks present you.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:22 am 
Offline
EnviroLink Volunteer
EnviroLink Volunteer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:45 pm
Posts: 20562
Location: Southeastern US
It also appears that the commercial airline engines trended to the more fuel efficient high bypass ratio turbofan engine in the 1990s which just happens to correlate to the development of the chemtrail theories based on perceived changes in the contrails from these new engines.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:44 am 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 9:27 am
Posts: 5776
Location: USA
Pratt & Whitney’s
Geared Turbofan™ Engine:
The Economic and Environmental Solution


http://events.aaae.org/sites/080504/ass ... %20LEE.pdf

_________________
TANG SOO!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:07 pm 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:59 am
Posts: 2290
Location: Central Colorado
deb wrote:
Warmair,

What I'm seeing is pollution for sure...chemtrail pollution! The who, what and why is debatable at this stage, until we can discover more, but my observation of increased aircraft spraying volumes of material in the sky is not. I see the planes, I see the "stuff", I see the "consequences". And I see the urgent need to do something about it!

Deb

You see how effective the disinformation campaign is with all the supposedly intelligent people in denial that "chemtrails" even exist.
What must be remembered is that the people authorizing and doing this are convinced they are helping to cool the planet and that the few who suffer allergies to it are just the price of continuing to do business as usual.
The problem is that if they do the right thing and reduce burning 90%, the economy tanks. Also, if they don't keep doing it, the temperature will go up 5*F immediately with dire consequences. What anthropogenic global warming is already doing is bad enough, even with the albedo change program.
They just don't know what else to do to prolong the inevitable when the oil runs out and they can no longer fly the missions, and the tundra and oceanic methane is in a self sustained hyperbolic heating to total turnover stage.
There are probably those building underground fortresses and still others planning space flights to escape. Their success would be nice, but doubtful. We just can't see prospective planets good enough, and last underground the length of time to have the biosphere return to benevolent for human life.
The powers that be decided long ago to try to hide or just deny the problems of overpopulation and AGW until it was too late to take an easier way out by reducing population in the 1970s and reducing emissions in the early 1990s. Profits and short term thinking prevailed :crazy: :twisted: , and ecocide will be the result. :cry: :-({|= O:)
=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

For Wayne:
http://www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/jekyll-hyde.pdf

_________________
"With every decision, think seven generations ahead of the consequences of your actions" Ute rule of life.
“We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children”― Chief Seattle
“Those Who Have the Privilege to Know Have the Duty to Act”…Albert Einstein


Last edited by Johhny Electriglide on Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:48 pm 
Offline
EnviroLink Volunteer
EnviroLink Volunteer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:45 pm
Posts: 20562
Location: Southeastern US
Johhny Electriglide wrote:
deb wrote:
Warmair,

What I'm seeing is pollution for sure...chemtrail pollution! The who, what and why is debatable at this stage, until we can discover more, but my observation of increased aircraft spraying volumes of material in the sky is not. I see the planes, I see the "stuff", I see the "consequences". And I see the urgent need to do something about it!

Deb

You see how effective the disinformation campaign is with all the supposedly intelligent people in denial that "chemtrails" even exist.


That would relate directly to there not being ANY hard evidence of their existence.

Quote:
What must be remembered is that the people authorizing and doing this are convinced they are helping to cool the planet and that the few who suffer allergies to it are just the price of continuing to do business as usual.


Really? Who exactly is authorizing and doing this? Perhaps they can explain how the math fails to cover this supposed cooling program?

Quote:
The problem is that if they do the right thing and reduce burning 90%, the economy tanks. Also, if they don't keep doing it, the temperature will go up 5*F immediately with dire consequences. What anthropogenic global warming is already doing is bad enough, even with the albedo change program.


The figures do not match anything I have ever seen, any references to support them?

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:00 am 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:59 am
Posts: 2290
Location: Central Colorado
Wayne Stollings wrote:

Really? Who exactly is authorizing and doing this? Perhaps they can explain how the math fails to cover this supposed cooling program?

Quote:
The problem is that if they do the right thing and reduce burning 90%, the economy tanks. Also, if they don't keep doing it, the temperature will go up 5*F immediately with dire consequences. What anthropogenic global warming is already doing is bad enough, even with the albedo change program.


The figures do not match anything I have ever seen, any references to support them?

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=24192
You do remember the +3*F temperature spikes on the no fly days in 2001, and that atmospheric CO2 has been going up 2 to 3% annually. Plus your plant hardiness zone map, in explanations at the site at the time, explained it was because of a +5*F difference from 1993 to 2012.
and this;
http://www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/jekyll-hyde.pdf
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=24096
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=24077
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=18718
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=12241

_________________
"With every decision, think seven generations ahead of the consequences of your actions" Ute rule of life.
“We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children”― Chief Seattle
“Those Who Have the Privilege to Know Have the Duty to Act”…Albert Einstein


Last edited by Johhny Electriglide on Sat Mar 30, 2013 2:57 am, edited 4 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:33 am 
Offline
EnviroLink Volunteer
EnviroLink Volunteer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:45 pm
Posts: 20562
Location: Southeastern US
Johhny Electriglide wrote:
Wayne Stollings wrote:

Really? Who exactly is authorizing and doing this? Perhaps they can explain how the math fails to cover this supposed cooling program?

Quote:
The problem is that if they do the right thing and reduce burning 90%, the economy tanks. Also, if they don't keep doing it, the temperature will go up 5*F immediately with dire consequences. What anthropogenic global warming is already doing is bad enough, even with the albedo change program.


The figures do not match anything I have ever seen, any references to support them?


You do remember the +3*F temperature spikes on the no fly days in 2001, and that atmospheric CO2 has been going up 2 to 3% annually.


Even assuming the increase was 3 degrees rather than the 2 reported, that does not add up to the change indicated even with assuming a direct linear increase tied to CO2 levels.

The increase was between the low temperature and the high temperature, or the diurnal variation. It actually got both colder and warmer during that period. Warmer during the day and cooler at night.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v4 ... 8601a.html

The potential of condensation trails (contrails) from jet aircraft to affect regional-scale surface temperatures has been debated for years1, 2, 3, but was difficult to verify until an opportunity arose as a result of the three-day grounding of all commercial aircraft in the United States in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001. Here we show that there was an anomalous increase in the average diurnal temperature range (that is, the difference between the daytime maximum and night-time minimum temperatures) for the period 11–14 September 2001. Because persisting contrails can reduce the transfer of both incoming solar and outgoing infrared radiation4, 5 and so reduce the daily temperature range, we attribute at least a portion of this anomaly to the absence of contrails over this period.



Quote:
Plus your plant hardiness zone map, in explanations at the site at the time, explained it was because of a +5*F difference from 1993 to 2012.


Which is not related to "chemtrails" or lack thereof in any way.

Quote:


What is that supposed to be? An interpretation of how the out of context statements can be pieced together?

This researcher believes they increase the temperature .....

http://phys.org/news/2013-02-jets-contr ... level.html

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 5:52 pm 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:59 am
Posts: 2290
Location: Central Colorado
Johhny Electriglide wrote:
Wayne Stollings wrote:

Really? Who exactly is authorizing and doing this? Perhaps they can explain how the math fails to cover this supposed cooling program?

Quote:
The problem is that if they do the right thing and reduce burning 90%, the economy tanks. Also, if they don't keep doing it, the temperature will go up 5*F immediately with dire consequences. What anthropogenic global warming is already doing is bad enough, even with the albedo change program.


The figures do not match anything I have ever seen, any references to support them?

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=24192
You do remember the +3*F temperature spikes on the no fly days in 2001, and that atmospheric CO2 has been going up 2 to 3% annually. Plus your plant hardiness zone map, in explanations at the site at the time, explained it was because of a +5*F difference from 1993 to 2012.
and this;
http://www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/jekyll-hyde.pdf
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=24096
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=24077
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=18718
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=12241

Here is an award winning documentary on it;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... EfJO0-cTis

_________________
"With every decision, think seven generations ahead of the consequences of your actions" Ute rule of life.
“We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children”― Chief Seattle
“Those Who Have the Privilege to Know Have the Duty to Act”…Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 6:44 pm 
Offline
EnviroLink Volunteer
EnviroLink Volunteer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:45 pm
Posts: 20562
Location: Southeastern US
Johhny Electriglide wrote:
Wayne Stollings wrote:

Really? Who exactly is authorizing and doing this? Perhaps they can explain how the math fails to cover this supposed cooling program?

Quote:
The problem is that if they do the right thing and reduce burning 90%, the economy tanks. Also, if they don't keep doing it, the temperature will go up 5*F immediately with dire consequences. What anthropogenic global warming is already doing is bad enough, even with the albedo change program.


The figures do not match anything I have ever seen, any references to support them?

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=24192
You do remember the +3*F temperature spikes on the no fly days in 2001, and that atmospheric CO2 has been going up 2 to 3% annually. Plus your plant hardiness zone map, in explanations at the site at the time, explained it was because of a +5*F difference from 1993 to 2012.
and this;
http://www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/jekyll-hyde.pdf
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=24096
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=24077
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=18718
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=12241



Johhny Electriglide wrote:
Here is an award winning documentary on it;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... EfJO0-cTis



Yes, it won really impressive awards, such as the official selection of the Paterson Falls Film Festival.

Here is another award winning film with which to compare:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtevF4B4RtQ

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 10:41 am 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 10:21 am
Posts: 1
These are interesting
Bye Bye blue sky
Boy Who Cried Warming

:)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 7:15 am 
Offline
EnviroLink Volunteer
EnviroLink Volunteer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:45 pm
Posts: 20562
Location: Southeastern US
entertaining? .... maybe
informational? .... not really
accurate? ..... not in the least

Indie films are films first and foremost. The opinions, which are dressed as facts, carry more weight than actual factual information in most of them.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:28 am 
Offline
Member with 50 posts!
Member with 50 posts!

Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 10:30 pm
Posts: 151
The only way some chemtrail conspiracy would make sense is if they were experimenting with sun blocking material in a remote area to test its effect. This would be for a limited time until they completed their studies. There are certainly precedents for conspiracies that are limited in time and space and numbers involved(Limited to need to know participants). Wide ranging long term conspiracies involving lots of participants, at least conscious ones, I know no precedent for.

The mother of all conspiracy theories is the devil and his evil minions being behind all bad things that happen. That and variations are a major underpinning of much of religion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 3:43 pm 
Offline
EnviroLink Volunteer
EnviroLink Volunteer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 10:45 pm
Posts: 20562
Location: Southeastern US
Not only that, but the additional weight which would have to be added to each plane involved would make it almost impossible to have anything but a single purpose flight. Even if there were additives to the fuel making it the spraying product, the range would be significantly reduced between a chem and non-chem flight with the same weight of fuel. The combustion of the additive would be problematic as well. The math just does not support such a hyopothesis.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:01 pm 
Offline
Member with over 1000 posts!
Member with over 1000 posts!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 9:27 am
Posts: 5776
Location: USA
Dingo wrote:
The mother of all conspiracy theories is the devil and his evil minions being behind all bad things that happen. That and variations are a major underpinning of much of religion.


That would be quite the conspiracy amongst even the most religious with which I am acquainted, be they muslim, jewish, christian, or otherwise. Accidents and natural disasters tend to be bad things and I never hear any of them attributing them to some devil and/or evil minions.

Conspiracies are great entertainment but we need not be making them up. Arguing in absolutes doesn't generally bode well either.

_________________
TANG SOO!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group