Okay, so now along with Donnie, RF, and Wayne Stollings, all regular posters at animalrights.net and/or ethicdiscussion.com (both AR bashing sites), you've now added Amy and Festus - two long-time posters at ethicdiscussion.com - to the roster.
So you are aware of who post where because you visit those sites as well? Arc and Phanto have both alluded to the other sites they seem to visit on a regular basis. I started off on this site, in fact, I opposed the joining of the old enivronmental board with the animal rights board (Josh, I still disagree with the concept but I have been sucked in) in no uncertain terms. It is too bad that the old posts were lost or you could see just how "interesting" the discussions were between Josh and I. I believe he is more of an pro-AR person than I am and that created a more pro-AR aura in the beginning, but it is all relative to his being fair in the allowance of discussions.
I have been to several boards and I find the only ones who will regularly censor views are those very pro-AR sites. To get censored on this site or Brian's site, you have to be repeatedly warned about disruptive behavior. To be banned at other sites all you have to do is question a blatant case of libel or just hold an opposing view.
Top it all off with archer, meat-hunter (or whatever his name is), oinks, Red, Fosgate, Thelia - & probably more I've forgotten - and congratulations, Josh: You're well on the way to becoming the premier AR bashing site on all the net. And here you sit, yucking it up with them.
Nah, Brian's site is much better for the archives on the errors and problems within the AR movement.
Look, I'm not even speaking to you as a member of this board at this point. But get a clue: You're being played like a fiddle.
You are not a member but you are registered and posting ..... and who needs to get a clue?
Really, if you truly believe there is misrepresentation of the AR movement, pull up your keyboard and give the references to support your claim. The facts will speak for themselves.