EnviroLink Forum

Yeah? What was the clarification? Can you explain it, instead of just pointing at it?

It amazes me how you can make some general, unsupported statements that don't even read well enough to have much meaning...and then conclude whatever you are talking about supports some other conclusion.

I'm sure it's all clear in your mind, though.

No that would be you sticking your foot into your mouth again because you did not read what was written.

So now that Wijim is deciding what is a nd isn't more important, so the3 lessers on the forum can gripe at him ... oh, wait, that will not happen because he is one of "us" so he gets to say such things.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

I don't know Donnie, which hole would that be again? The one where you claim one thing was posted when you assumed something else was written?

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

I'm sure Wijim has his own points to make, and can consider the article how he chooses. Obviously, some things in the article might be more important to his points than others.

The thing is, you don't get to arbitrarily decide that for him like some paternalistic, finger-pointing monkey.

Go back and read it for yourself, I have already noted it before. I do not need to do your research for you.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

I saw a post where you pointed at it.

Since you seem to want to exhibit your ignorance in such a grand fashion, if you were to look back in the thread you would see that it was made BEFORE my post pointing out there were other issues discussed which were not in the original article. That was the post with which Donnie took offense. He nor you seem to take offense with Wijim making the same type of statement as you now take offense with others. I suppose it is because you are using that old double standard of dishonesty again.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

I'm sorry. You're going to have to try to write more clearly, and sometimes even specify just what you are talking about within your posts. All your uses of indefinite articles just look like so much bullshit spouting to me.

I'm sure all that spouting somehow goes to supporting your big ol' point about double-standards and mobs of conspiritors...but I think maybe you're missing that quite a few here don't consider your big ol' point to be of much value. Especially since you have been so obviously strained to support it.

I actually asked if someone could clarify your throphy remarks because they seemed kinda muddled to me Wayne in light of what this thread is about. You were so general in your remarks till you started to pretend you were only replying to Wiijim..

_________________
I use red, not because of anger but to define my posts to catch rebuttals latter and it makes the quote feature redundent for me. The rest of you pick your own color.

Life is a time capsule we strive to fill with precious memories.

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

Wayne, Wayne...

It's nobody's fault but yours that these grand points you claim you are making are such clumsy attempts. Just look at your opening statement here:



First of all, we have to assume you MEANT to write: "Since the original article dealt with trophy hunting, most of what you and others have said on the thread had nothing to do with the article."

That's not terribly important though. Lots of people make typos or write clumsy sentences, but it's usually pretty easy to see what they are saying...long as they ain't doing it deliberately in an attempt to bullshit their way out of a tough spot.

But more importantly, the original article did NOT deal strictly with trophy hunting. Trophy hunters were cited, but the author went on to make generalized observations about HUNTING, based on what trophy hunters supposedly said.

So see...if your big ol' point is based on that premise...which it appears so from the language you used....it's pretty much screwed from the get-go. "Hunting per se" is every bit as much the "focus" as trophy hunting.

From the article:

Feel free to try to worry at that wound some more though.

I tried to get Wayne to see that RF. Easier for him to call others dishonest then admitt he jumped the GUN so to speak.

_________________
I use red, not because of anger but to define my posts to catch rebuttals latter and it makes the quote feature redundent for me. The rest of you pick your own color.

Life is a time capsule we strive to fill with precious memories.

Yes, dealing with multiple posts from multiple people tryign to twist things differently is really condusive to preventing typos.



Not supposedly since that line has been used here many times, but there were not really observations about hunting in general but the statements made by trophy hunters.



Because they did not preface hunting with "trophy" in the relation of a common defense it changes the "focus" of the article? All of those references to TROPHY were just a ruse ....



I see the real focus of the article was gathering which is why Donnie went off on the accusations that Sianblooz was using this against hunters ... remember this point was where the thread got derailed. That was a clear focus based on this reference to what trophy hunters say ....

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein

focus[1]
(noun) 5 a : a center of activity, attraction, or attention <the focus of the meeting was drug abuse>; b : a point of concentration

_________________
With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none”
Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein