Conservative australian liberal senator makes case for net zero climate targets, citing party’s environmental heritage

Australian Liberal Senator Andrew McLachlan is breaking ranks with climate skeptics in his party, arguing that conservatives should embrace rather than abandon net zero emissions targets. In a recent opinion piece, the self-described “conservative” senator contends that opposing environmental accountability measures contradicts core conservative principles, particularly since the Liberal Party itself once championed such targets.

McLachlan draws his environmental philosophy from what he describes as his Celtic heritage and Anglican faith, emphasizing that “nature must be at the centre of all decision making.” This perspective has shaped his political approach as a senator, driving what he calls “a deep and abiding commitment to leave the planet healthier than when I was born.” His stance reflects a growing tension within Australia’s Liberal Party between traditional conservative environmental stewardship and more recent climate policy resistance.

The senator’s position highlights an interesting political dynamic in Australian climate politics, where some conservatives are advocating for stronger environmental action while their party has moved away from previous climate commitments. McLachlan admits to feeling isolated during internal party discussions, questioning whether he represents a “real conservative” minority within the Liberal caucus.

His argument centers on the idea that true conservatives should embrace accountability measures like net zero targets, rather than retreating from environmental responsibilities. This perspective challenges the current political narrative that positions climate action as primarily a progressive issue, suggesting instead that environmental stewardship aligns with traditional conservative values of responsibility and long-term thinking.