Australian climate-skeptic think tank and conservation group refuse to disclose funding sources during senate misinformation inquiry

Two influential organizations came under intense scrutiny during a heated Australian Senate inquiry into climate and energy misinformation, with both groups steadfastly refusing to reveal their financial backers despite pointed questioning from lawmakers.

The Institute of Public Affairs (IPA), a prominent think tank known for its climate science denial, and Rainforest Reserves Australia, a conservation group that has surprisingly opposed renewable energy projects, drew sharp criticism for their lack of transparency during Wednesday’s proceedings. Greens Senator Peter Whish-Wilson, who chairs the committee, specifically pressed Rainforest Reserves Australia’s vice-president Steven Nowakowski about the funding sources behind nine expensive full-page newspaper advertisements. These ads promoted an open letter that attacked Australia’s transition to renewable energy while advocating for nuclear power instead.

The IPA’s funding opacity is particularly noteworthy given that Gina Rinehart, Australia’s wealthiest individual and a mining magnate, has previously donated to the organization. However, the think tank refused to confirm whether Rinehart continues to provide financial support, leaving questions about potential conflicts of interest unanswered.

This standoff highlights a broader concern about “dark money” in climate debates – funding from undisclosed sources that may influence public policy discussions. The inquiry reflects growing scrutiny of organizations that spread climate misinformation while keeping their financial backing secret, raising important questions about transparency and accountability in Australia’s ongoing energy transition debate.